Skip to content

· Private foundation

One Judge

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$339kEnvironment$72kHuman Services$40kEducation$3kHousing & Shelter$1kHealth$1kRecreation & Sports$1kOther$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $39k
$1,250
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEIRS OF GRACE CHURCH$27,150
MISSION H2O$11,800
GTI HOPE$1,250
IFCJ$1,000
HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES$1,000
EMERGING GRACE MINISTRIES$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–26, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $8k → 16%MERCY CHEF: $500 → 20%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $14k → 12%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $10k → 12%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $6k → 12%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 12%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $1k → 12%HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $550 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of One Judge’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

One Judgelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$497k · 6 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$497k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
+50%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEducationScience & TechReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FLAMES OF GLORY COWBOY CHURCH
    7× · 2018–2025 · $271k
  • MH
    Mission H2O
    5× · 2022–2026 · $84k · revenue -38% · 42% of their budget
  • HO
    HEIRS OF GRACE CHRUCH
    9× · 2017–2025 · $67k

Funded once

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +50%
  • SH
    SETTLEMENT HOME IN AUSTIN
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CH
    CHAMPIONSHIP HEARTS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
2
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
3
TEN9 Ministries

Proclaiming the gospel of Jesus Christ worldwide

Religion
4
Fountains of Hope International Inc

Fountains of Hope is committed to serving God by providing safe water and community needs in developing countries and in disaster relief areas worldwide.

International
5
International Christian Partners Llc

Childrens Home and Ministry in India

Religion
6
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
7
Gateway 2 Missions

Our mission is to effect change in ways that will impact nearly every aspect of poverty.

—
8
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
9
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
10
Mercy in Action International
Human Services
11
Mercy International Foundation

Food, shelter, training for poor families.

Human Services
12
Take Heart Inc

Our mission motivated by the love of christ, we exist to spiritually encourage, technically equip, and financially suppot local leaders serving persecuted christians around the globe.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Chefs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mission H2O. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLAMES OF GLORY COWBOY CHURCH: $270,857 · OtherFLAMES OF GLORY COWBOY CHURCHHEIRS OF GRACE CHRUCH: $67,250 · OtherHEIRS OF GRACE CHRUCHIndividual grant recipient: $27,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHEIRS OF GRACE CHURCH: $27,150 · OtherHEIRS OF GRACE CHURCH+6 more: $10,860 · OtherMission H2O: $84,100 · Science & TechMission H2OHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $40,050 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationGTI HOPE: $1,250 · EducationCHAMPIONSHIP HEARTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentEmerging Grace Ministries Inc: $500 · Religion
Other$403,467Science & Tech$84,100Human Services$40,550Education$4,250Health$1,000Youth Development$1,000Religion$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMission H2O: $84,100 over 5y, 42% of budgetHOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES: $40,050 over 7y, 24% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAMPIONSHIP HEARTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mission H2O ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GTI HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPIONSHIP HEARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds MERCY CHEFS INC ↗
  • Who funds Emerging Grace Ministries Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization One Judge funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from One Judge. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to One Judge?

    Find your warmest path to One Judge through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on One Judge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph