Skip to content

· Public charity

Omprakash Inc

Improve global education through cross-cultural exchange.

$7.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
—
States reached
$163k
Largest
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$559kFood & Nutrition$313kEnvironment$287kYouth Development$202kHealth$90kCivil Rights$88kArts & Culture$66kReligion$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $517,360, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,287,574 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,770,214 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $366k
$13,941
Median grant
—
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
solar4africa$162,600
Diaspora Family Healing Network$139,705
Individual grant recipient$64,035
Arctic Children and Youth Foundatio$41,752
Individual grant recipient$21,274
The Root Experience Collective$14,778
Space Pirates Theater Collective$13,941
Hollistic Health in Pomona$12,755
Individual grant recipient$9,927
Pothos Productions LLC$7,840
GRO$7,615
Heart2Heart$7,300
Individual grant recipient$7,000
The Formula Project$6,838
02The need
03

Where the grant dollars land

Across the US and around the world.

Grants abroad, by region: $6.5M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$1.7M · 26% · 5 grants
South Asia$1.4M · 21% · 16 grants
Middle East and North Africa$1.1M · 18% · 5 grants
Central America and the Caribbean$932k · 14% · 10 grants
Sub-Saharan Africa$645k · 10% · 12 grants
Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$516k · 8% · 5 grants
South America$106k · 2% · 4 grants
North America (Canada and Mexico)$103k · 2% · 3 grants
How this is measured
Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 11 repeat orgs$247k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$1.8M
$136k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DF
    Diaspora Family Healing Network
    4× · 2022–2025 · $559k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2020–2022 · $313k
  • S
    solar4africa
    3× · 2023–2025 · $287k

Funded once

  • RV
    River Valley Community Health
    one grant, 2022 · $49k
  • T2
    The 21st Century Chinese Culture As
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2020–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2020 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Diaspora Family Healing Network: $559,382 · OtherDiaspora Family Healing NetworkIndividual grant recipient: $312,570 · OtherIndividual grant recipientsolar4africa: $287,455 · Othersolar4africaIndividual grant recipient: $229,126 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTeen of Color Abroad: $150,318 · OtherTeen of Color AbroadIndividual grant recipient: $87,949 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $80,535 · Other+20 more: $367,469 · Other+20 more
Other$2,074,804

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Omprakash Inc?

Find your warmest path to Omprakash Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Omprakash’s filings →

More from the funding graph