Skip to content
Ohr Yosef Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ohr Yosef Inc

To help disadvantaged children, widows and orphans by providing food, clothing, supplies and grants to charitable tax exempt organizations.

$3.5M
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$566k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$1.2MHealth$113kEducation$46kPhilanthropy$38kArts & Culture$23kInternational$16kHuman Services$7k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $576,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,518,800 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,942,800 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $566k
$566,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHASDEI YITZCHOK$566,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS KIRYAT CHINUCH LAB$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $46k → 6%AMERICAN FREINDS OF SHEVACH INC: $13k → 11%DAAS MEISHARIM: $15k → 13%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF ROCHESTER: $12k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RABBINICAL: $18k → 14%AMERICAN COMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK: $100k → 17%LMAHN ACHAI INC: $28k → 20%TOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $7k → 11%AMERICAN FREINDS OF AHAVAT SHALOM: $10k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RABBINICAL: $10k → 14%FREINDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $23k → 17%LMAHN ACHAI INC: $18k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS KIRYAT CHINUCH LAB: $10k → 17%FREINDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIM: $9k → 20%YESHIVA BUILDING FUND INC: $8k → 17%KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $203k → 20%AMERICAN FREINDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA: $68k → 17%KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $71k → 20%YESHIVAT HANEGEV INC: $8k → 17%KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $50k → 20%YAD DAVID: $26k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SUCATH DAVID: $25k → 20%YAD DAVID INC: $18k → 20%NACHLAT MOSHE INC: $16k → 20%AMERICAN FREINDS OF BINYAN AV: $15k → 20%AMERICAN FREINDS OF SUCATH DAVID: $10k → 20%YAD DAVID INC: $8k → 20%FRIENDS OF OR ISRAEL CHARITABLE: $12k → 20%AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ: $6k → 20%MOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $20k → 20%CHASDEI YITZCHOK: $566k → 20%YEKERAI YERUSHALAYIM: $9k → 20%MAOZ TORAT ASAF: $6k → 20%YESHIVA ATERES YISROEL: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $2.9M on the FY2023 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$2.9M · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: GRANTS TO INDIGENT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

33%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$485k · 5 repeat orgs$988k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
20

Total granted

$485k
$412k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
-1%

Still filing today

100%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $576k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
InternationalPhilanthropyReligionEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST
    3× · 2020–2022 · $324k · revenue +144%
  • YD
    YAD DAVID INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $52k · revenue +162%
  • LA
    LMAHN ACHAI INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $46k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -1%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $68k · revenue -16%
  • TR
    TIFERET RABBI AKIVAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $46k · revenue +80%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
5
American Friends of Amaleh Shel Torah Inc

None

Education
6
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Tzir Hemed
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
9
American Friends Tomchai Shabat Foundation
—
10
American Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc

To award scholarships and grants to students from the United States attending Yeshivas Gedolah Matisyahu in the State of Israel

Education
11
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Heichal Yerushalayim Inc

The funding of heichal yerushalayim yeshiva(religious shcool) to facilitate and promote judaic studies.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Sucath David Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Binyan-Av Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHASDEI YITZCHOK: $566,000 · OtherCHASDEI YITZCHOK+7 more: $73,800 · Other+7 moreKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $324,000 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUSTTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $46,000 · PhilanthropyTIFERET RABBI AKIVADAAS MEISHARIM: $15,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BINYAN-AV FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $9,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $100,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FO…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $68,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF H…YAD DAVID INC: $52,000 · InternationalYAD DAVID INCAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SUCATH DAVID INC: $35,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF S…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHEVACH INC: $13,200 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KIRYAT CHINUCH LABONIM INC: $10,000 · International+1 more: $6,000 · InternationalLMAHN ACHAI INC: $46,000 · ReligionMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $20,000 · ReligionTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $7,200 · ReligionAmerican Friends of The Rabbinical College Kol Torah Inc: $28,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $9,000 · EducationYESHIVA BUILDING FUND INC: $7,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $22,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$639,800Philanthropy$409,000International$284,200Religion$73,200Education$44,500Arts & Culture$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $324,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC: $68,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetYAD DAVID INC: $52,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $46,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLMAHN ACHAI INC: $46,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SUCATH DAVID INC: $35,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of The Rabbinical College Kol Torah Inc: $28,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDAAS MEISHARIM: $15,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BINYAN-AV FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF-OR-ISRAEL CHARITABLE TRUST: $12,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KIRYAT CHINUCH LABONIM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF SHEARIM HAMETSUYANIMINC: $9,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $9,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetYESHIVA BUILDING FUND INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTOMCHEI TZEDAKA CORP: $7,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SANZ INSTITUTIONS IN ISRAEL INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…The Jimmy and Berta K…The Foop FoundationThe Adjmi-Dwek Founda…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…The Eddie and Rachell…The Amin and Lillian …Chehebar Family Found…The Ralph S Gindi Fam…Joseph Chehebar Famil…The Ojc Fund
Jewish Communal FundNY32.2× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Foop Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Eddie and Rachelle Betesh Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Joseph Chehebar Family Foundation · The Ojc Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ohr Yosef Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohr Yosef Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ohr Yosef’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home