Skip to content

· Public charity

Ohio River Valley Environmental Coalition

Organize and maintain an diverse grassroots organization dedicated to the imporvement and preservation of the environment and preservation of the environment and communities through education and creassroots organizing

$105k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$232kEnvironment$142kPublic Benefit$70kCivil Rights$7k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $93,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $104,618 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$93,618
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WV RIVERS COALATION$93,618
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EARTH JUSTICE: $6k → 10%CONSERVATION LEGACY: $7k → 12%CONCERNED OHIO RIVER RESIDENTS: $70k → 17%WV CITIZENS ACTION EDUCATION: $81k → 18%RAMPS COOPERATIVE FORTRESS INC: $21k → 19%WV CITIZENS ACTION EDUCATION: $39k → 18%WV CITIZENS ACTION EDUCATION: $38k → 18%WV CITIZENS ACTION EDUCATION: $35k → 18%WV CITIZENS ACTION EDUCATION: $17k → 18%WV RIVERS COALATION: $94k → 18%WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALTION: $35k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND: $211,028 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUNDWEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC: $128,618 · EnvironmentWEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION IN…EARTHJUSTICE: $6,000 · EnvironmentCONCERNED OHIO RIVER RESIDENTS: $70,160 · OtherCONCERNED OHIO RIVER RES…RAMPS COOPERATIVE FORTRESS INC: $21,120 · OtherRAMPS COOPERATIVE FORTRE…NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE: $7,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR…CONSERVATION LEGACY: $7,000 · Youth Development
Education$211,028Environment$134,618Other$98,280Youth Development$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND: $211,028 over 5y, 23% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC: $128,618 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA CITIZEN ACTION EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA RIVERS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ohio River Valley Environmental Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohio River Valley Environmental Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ohio River Valley Environmental Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph