Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ohel Rachel Ve Leah Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$138k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$93k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$709kPhilanthropy$14kFood & Nutrition$13kHuman Services$12kEducation$4kHealth$4kCivil Rights$1kYouth Development$602Other$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k21 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $93k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$424
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES$92,600
KEREN YOM TOV$11,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA$7,101
SEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION$5,933
SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC$5,000
VARIOUS CHARITIES$3,353
Individual grant recipient$2,000
BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE$1,800
AISHEL SHABBAT$1,001
SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM$1,000
TAB FOR A CAUSE$1,000
YESHIVAT HECHAL SHEMUEL$1,000
TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES$1,000
ATERET TORAH$750
AHI EZER YESHIVA$681
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $5k → 20%SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $3k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%MICHAELMKAMEOFOUNDATIONINC: $2k → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $1k → 20%CARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $501 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$698k · 17 repeat orgs$206k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against -20% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
46

Total granted

$698k
$196k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
-20%

Still filing today

47%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KY
    KEREN YOM TOV INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $147k · revenue +38%
  • TS
    THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +18%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $11k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • Y
    YDE
    one grant, 2020 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • ST
    SEPHARDIC TORAH CENTER KOLLEL
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Maarava Machon

To support educational advancement of yeshiva high school students

Unclassified
7
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
8
Sherit Isroel
—
9
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
10
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
11
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
12
American Friends of Yeshiva Tiferet

To solicit, collect and otherwise raise money to support and further the educational work of yeshiva tiferet, a school located in jerusalem, israel, and to generally support, further and advance yeshiva tiferet by all available means and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivat Shaare Torah Inc; the most unlike its peers is Magen Abraham Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 75 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/28
Grantees still filing
12/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $337,740 · ReligionYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INCKEREN YOM TOV INC: $146,976 · ReligionKEREN YOM TOV INC+6 more: $19,403 · ReligionYDE: $75,000 · OtherYDESEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION INC: $54,197 · OtherSEPHARDIC LEBANESE CONGREGATION INCSEPHARDIC CONGREGATION OF LONG BRANCH INC: $37,750 · OtherSEPHARDIC CONGREGATION OF LONG BRANCH INCIndividual grant recipient: $34,008 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION SHAARE ZION: $23,420 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE ZIONIndividual grant recipient: $15,417 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON: $14,101 · OtherSEPHARDIC TORAH CENTER KOLLEL: $12,801 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAARE SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $12,372 · Other+41 more: $82,482 · Other+41 moreTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $12,500 · Food & NutritionSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $8,950 · Human ServicesMICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $1,000 · Human ServicesCARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $501 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $6,467 · PhilanthropyAmerican Friends of Ayelet Hashachar: $4,000 · PhilanthropyBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $2,301 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $952 · EducationYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $501 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $500 · EducationMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $360 · EducationMABAS FUND INC: $300 · Education+2 more: $251 · EducationCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,250 · HealthSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $1,800 · Health
Religion$504,119Other$361,548Food & Nutrition$12,500Human Services$12,451Philanthropy$10,467Education$5,165Health$4,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC: $337,740 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN YOM TOV INC: $146,976 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON: $14,101 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC: $12,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA: $10,701 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $8,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $6,467 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ayelet Hashachar: $4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT NACHALAT YOSSEF: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC: $2,301 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORCHOT DAVID INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SUCATH DAVID INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $952 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $501 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KETER TORAH INC: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $501 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAOR YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMABAS FUND INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT SHALSHELET INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMET LEYAAKOB INC: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAT DARCHE ERES INC ↗
  • Who funds KEREN YOM TOV INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEV AHARON ↗
  • Who funds THE SEPHARDIC FOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ARAM SOBA ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Ayelet Hashachar ↗
  • Who funds THE KESHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT NACHALAT YOSSEF ↗
  • Who funds BET YAAKOV OF THE JERSEY SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHAEL M KAMEO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEPHARDIC MEDICAL RESOURCES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY54.7× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Mary & Abe Sutton Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Setton Foundation · E R G Foundation · Isaac & Marjorie Gindi Foundation Inc · Jack D Cohen Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ohel Rachel Ve Leah Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ohel Rachel Ve Leah Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ohel Rachel Ve Leah Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Ohel Rachel Ve Leah Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 75 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ohel Rachel Ve Leah’s filings →

More from the funding graph