How much did OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 98% of OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

afl-cio

2022

strikeopeiu

2023

opeiu

2024

—

2025

cbtuinternationalblackactiveaffectolder retiredretired workers

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k2 grants · $16k
$10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$250k+1 grant · $1.0M

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$56M

Total assets

Largest grants

OPEIU LOCAL 6$1,048,000
COALITION OF BLACK TRADE UNIONISTS$10,000
COALITION OF KAISER PERMANENTE UNIONS$8,399
ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 37% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$376k · 9 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$376k

$581k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-35%

-2%

Still filing today

11%

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsEmploymentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

OL
OPEIU LOCAL 6
3× · 2022–2024 · $144k
SF
SHOOT FOR A CURE
6× · 2019–2024 · $50k
OL
OPEIU LOCAL NO 322 AMLU
4× · 2018–2021 · $30k

Funded once

OL
OPEIU LOCAL 153
one grant, 2022 · $350k
OL
OPEIU LOCAL 174
one grant, 2022 · $75k
CP
COMMUNITY PARTNERS FOR I AM 2018
one grant, 2018 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Afl-Cio Union Lawyers Alliance

Afl-cio union lawyers alliance was established to better the conditions of workers and their families by enhancing the quality of legal representation that is available to the afl-cio and the national and international unions affiliated…

—

Amalgamated Transit Union

The object of the international union shall be to organize local unions. to place our occupation on a higher plane of intelligence, efficiency and skill; encourage settlement of disputes between employees and employers; secure employment…

—

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local

Union purposes include negotiating fair wages, safe working conditions, job protection and education of its members. membership consists of journeymen and apprentices of the plumbing and pipefitting industry.

—

International Union of Operating

The work of the union, as the representative of its members, is to provide for the continuous employment of labor, to bring about stable conditions in the industry, and to establish necessary procedures for resolutions of disputes between…

—

United Steelworkers

Local Union enorced the Collective Barganing Agreetment to better the working conditions of the Local Union and provide Representation to its members.

—

International Union of Operating

Labor union activity represents union members.

—

International Brotherhood of

Labor union - electrical workers

—

University of Michigan

Organized labor engaged in collective bargaining.

—

Laborers' International Union Local 1092

To coordinate any labor matters and to administer to any labor problems of members of the union.

—

United Public Service Employees

To provide collective bargaining representation to members.

—

American Federation of Labor and

To assist in organizing the unorganized workers in mississippi.

—

Chicago & Midwest Regional Joint Board

The joint board's purpose is to organize workers for the economic, moral and social advancement for their condition and status in life. the joint board also promotes efficient service to the public and the best interest for member's…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance for Retired Americans and the most unlike its peers is Illinois Podiatric Medical Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

11/11

Grantees still filing

5/11

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,979,550Civil Rights$17,500Employment$15,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Union of Painters AndMD18.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Union of Painters And · International Brotherhood Of · Int Union United Auto National · Grand Lodge International Association · United Steel Paper and Forestry · United Food and Commercial Workers · Communications Workers of America · American Federation of Labor And · American Federation of State County · National Nurses United · 1199 Seiu United Healthcare Workers East · Unite Here

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~3 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 341044086 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Office and Professional Employees?

Find your warmest path to Office and Professional Employees through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Office and Professional Employees?

More from the funding graph

OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Office and Professional Employees?

More from the funding graph