Skip to content

· Public charity

Ntrac Tsa-C Inc

Our purpose is to advance health care for trauma victims in rural and urban communities through local fire departments, first responders, ems groups, and hospitals.

$183k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$33k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$774kPublic Safety & Disaster$365kHuman Services$118k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $169,405, the rows itemized in this filing. The $182,963 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $13,558 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $143k
$12,971
Median grant
1
States reached
$518k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLAY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EMS$32,927
Individual grant recipient$19,975
Individual grant recipient$14,811
AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE$14,472
FAITH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL EMS$13,730
Individual grant recipient$12,971
Individual grant recipient$12,809
THREE RIVERS AMBULANCE SERVICES$10,463
Individual grant recipient$10,399
ELECTRA TRI MED AMBULANCE SERVICE$9,863
Individual grant recipient$8,619
Individual grant recipient$8,366
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%Archer City Ambulance Service: $12k → 9%CLAY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL EMS: $33k → 11%SeymourBaylor EMS: $24k → 14%American Medical Response: $34k → 16%Graham Young County EMS: $18k → 16%Faith Community Hospital EMS: $26k → 16%Hardeman County EMS: $20k → 16%Vernon Fire & EMS: $28k → 17%Three Rivers Ambulance Service: $20k → 17%Clay County Memorial Hospital and EMS: $31k → 11%SeymourBaylor EMS: $22k → 14%American Medical Response: $18k → 16%Graham Young County EMS: $16k → 16%Faith Community Hospital: $25k → 16%Hardeman County EMS: $19k → 16%Vernon Fire & EMS: $25k → 17%Three Rivers Ambulance Service: $18k → 17%Clay County Memorial Hospital and EMS: $28k → 11%SEYMOURBAYLOR COUNTY EMS: $13k → 14%American Medical Response: $15k → 16%Graham Young County EMS: $11k → 16%FAITH COMMUNITY HOSPITAL EMS: $14k → 16%VERNON FIREEMS: $15k → 17%THREE RIVERS AMBULANCE SERVICES: $10k → 17%Clay County Memorial Hospital and EMS: $16k → 11%SeymourBaylor EMS: $13k → 14%AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE: $14k → 16%Faith Community Hospital EMS: $14k → 16%Vernon Fire & EMS: $15k → 17%Clay County Memorial Hospital and EMS: $12k → 11%American Medical Response: $14k → 16%Faith Community Hospital EMS: $13k → 16%Vernon Fire & EMS: $11k → 17%Clay County Memorial Hospital and EMS: $12k → 11%Faith Community Hospital EMS: $13k → 16%Vernon Fire & EMS: $11k → 17%Clay County Memorial Hospital and EMS: $12k → 11%BOWIE FDEMS: $20k → 15%Vernon Fire & EMS: $11k → 17%Clay County Memorial Hospital and EMS: $12k → 11%Bowie Fire Department and EMS: $19k → 15%Vernon Fire & EMS: $10k → 17%Bowie Fire Department and EMS: $17k → 15%Bowie Fire Department and EMS: $11k → 15%OlneyHamilton EMS: $14k → 16%OLNEYYOUNG COUNTY EMS: $13k → 16%Trans Star Ambulance: $17k → 16%Trans Star Ambulance: $13k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 20 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$9k

Still filing today

10%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $103k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    American Medical Response
    9× · 2017–2025 · $127k
  • CC
    CLAY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $122k · revenue -97%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    7× · 2017–2023 · $111k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • SH
    Seymour Hospital
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

American Medical Response: $127,095 · OtherAmerican Medical ResponseCLAY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $121,529 · OtherCLAY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $110,710 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFaith Community Hospital EMS: $98,985 · OtherFaith Community Hospital EMSIndividual grant recipient: $95,755 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $88,419 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $84,962 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBowie Fire Department and EMS: $78,862 · OtherBowie Fire Department and EMSIndividual grant recipient: $72,075 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+20 more: $291,503 · Other+20 moreThree Rivers Ambulance Service Inc: $87,469 · Health
Other$1,169,895Health$87,469

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCLAY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $121,529 over 7y, 20% of budgetThree Rivers Ambulance Service Inc: $87,469 over 8y, 3.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CLAY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Three Rivers Ambulance Service Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ntrac Tsa-C Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ntrac Tsa-C Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ntrac Tsa-C’s filings →

    More from the funding graph