· Private foundation
Nsb Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $133k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YESHIVAT ATERET TORAH | $42,793 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA | $40,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $26,201 |
| Individual grant recipient | $24,000 |
| KEREN HAZEDAKA | $2,325 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS KOL REPHAEL | $2,210 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,916 |
| Individual grant recipient | $750 |
| MIRRER YESHIVA | $500 |
| YESHIVAT MIKDASH MELECH | $500 |
| YAD YOSEF TORAH CENTER | $500 |
| CONG YESHIVAS BAIS YISROEL | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $360 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250 |
| YESHIVAS OHR HACHAIM | $250 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOL REPHAEL INC8× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +32%
- FOFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC5× · 2017–2023 · $11k · revenue +32%
- KSKETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC4× · 2018–2023 · $7k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $2k
- CLCHESED LAVRAHAMone grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of religious schools in Israel
To support educational advancement of yeshiva high school students
Charity and education in u.s. and israel
The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
Make grants to jewish religious and educational institutions to support jewish religious education.
Provide support to further jewish education
Award grants to promote torah study
How this is measured
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBRON YESHIVA IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOL REPHAEL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
- Who funds KETER SHLOMO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KEREN HATZEDAKA INC ↗
- Who funds BNOT CHAYA ACADEMY CORP ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
- Who funds AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds MABAS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds AMUDEI CHESED INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Ojc Fund · The Setton Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Nsb Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nsb Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Nsb Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Nsb Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Nsb Family’s filings →