Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Mississippi · Public charity

Northtown Child Development Center

Provision of mentorship programs and supervision of court ordered visitation for at risk youth and their families.

$205k
Granted FY2023
7
Itemized grants FY2023
7
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2023
$180k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2023
$28,775
Largest grant, FY2023
$50,000
States reached, FY2023
4

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Chula Homa Hounds Inc$50,000182%
Chabad Jewish Center of Pierce County$33,7751n/a
Veterans of the 52nd and 6th Infantry Regiments Stationed in Bamberg German y$30,000191%
Beth Israel Congregation$28,7751n/a
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc$20,00010%
Ms Families as Allies Inc$10,0001n/a
Rankin County School District$7,5001n/a

Compare Northtown Child Development Center with peer funders

About Northtown Child Development Center

How much does Northtown Child Development Center give?
Northtown Child Development Center reported 7 itemized grants totaling $180,050, out of $205,052 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2023 IRS filing.
What does Northtown Child Development Center fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2023, its largest causes are Religion (35%), Animals (28%), Public Benefit (17%).
Who are Northtown Child Development Center's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2023: Chula Homa Hounds Inc ($50k), Chabad Jewish Center of Pierce County ($34k), Veterans of the 52nd and 6th Infantry Regiments Stationed in Bamberg German y ($30k).
Where is Northtown Child Development Center based?
Northtown Child Development Center is based in MS.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Northtown Child Development Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home