· Private foundation
Northern California Dx Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $166k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $165,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| PACIFIC ISLANDS DX GROUP | $18,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $8,698 |
| ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS RADIO SERV | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,500 |
| MEDITERRANEO DX CLUB | $2,005 |
| RADIO CLUB DE PROVINS | $2,000 |
| CONTEST UNIVERSITY INC | $1,530 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
US giving: 68% of grant dollars ($1.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 32% that went abroad ($508k) is mapped below.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
Beyond the US: 32% of all-years giving ($508k)
16 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
23 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- DEDX EXPEDDITIONS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $289k
- DDDATELINE DX ASSN LLC3× · 2017–2019 · $288k
- IGIndividual grant recipient3× · 2021–2023 · $136k
Funded once
- D2DICUE 2018 LLCone grant, 2018 · $100k
- PIPACIFIC ISLANDS DXPEDITION GROUP DBA PITCARIN ISLAND DXPEDITIONone grant, 2019 · $78k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $75k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Northern California Dx Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northern California Dx Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Northern California Dx Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Northern California Dx Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Northern California Dx’s filings →