How much does Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund give?

Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund reported 3 grants totaling $760,095 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 4 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.

What does Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund fund?

By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (100%).

Who are Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Verde Baptist Church ($3.4M), Camp Verde United Christian School ($1.2M), Northland Christian School of Flagstaff ($272k).

Does Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund fund new organizations?

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Where is Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund based?

Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund is based in AZ.

Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund

Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund at a glance Also receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund

Organizations mission - the organization is a school tuition organization as defined in arizona revised statute 43-1089, for the purpose of providing scholarships and grants to eligible children in kindergarten through grade 12 who attend any qualified school in arizona.

$760k

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

States reached

$542k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Education$4.8M

02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

$50k–250k2 grants · $218k
$250k+1 grant · $542k

$165,309

Median grant

States reached

$1.4M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
VERDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY	$542,492
UNITED CHRISTIAN SCHOOL	$165,309
NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL	$52,294

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$4.8M · 3 repeat orgs$747k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +317% since the first grant, against +88% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.8M

$747k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+317%

+88%

Still filing today

67%

33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

VB
VERDE BAPTIST CHURCH
6× · 2018–2024 · $3.4M
CV
Camp Verde United Christian School
7× · 2018–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +56%
NC
NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF FLAGSTAFF
6× · 2018–2024 · $272k · revenue +317% · 34% of their budget

Funded once

VC
VERDE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
one grant, 2022 · $688k
NC
NORTHLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
one grant, 2022 · $54k
FC
FLAGSTAFF CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +88%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

3/3

Grantees still filing

3/3

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$4,114,256Education$1,479,090

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund?

Find your warmest path to Northern Az Christian School Scholarship Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

Play a game based on Northern Az Christian School Scholarship’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home