Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Louisiana · Public charity

North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc

To provide economic development assistance. To alleviate conditions of substantial and persistent unemployment within the district through the creation of new employment opportunities by developing and expanding new and existing facilities and resources by whatever means the board deems necessary and proper.

$427k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
9
Organizations funded FY2020
22%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$23,255
Largest grant, FY2020
$255,489
Organizations funded a year
9 to 9
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
1
Total assets, FY2020
$2.6M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 22% of the organizations North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 66% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20209$423k22%
FY20199$1.4M11%
FY20189$1.4M0%
FY20179$1.4Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Human Services$4.4MFood & Nutrition$255kCrime & Legal$42k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Union Council on Aging Inc$772,216457%
The Madison Voluntary Council on Aging Inc$703,444444%
Jackson Council on the Aging Inc$633,986427%
Richland Voluntary Council on Aging Inc$616,852491%
Franklin Council on Aging Inc$521,856450%
Tensas Council on Aging Inc$474,843455%
East Carroll Council on Aging$435,158455%
A Helping Hand Too LLC$118,9932n/a
Faith & Hope Ind Living$54,5021n/a
Legal Services of North Louisiana$42,379363%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($281k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 8 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnion Council on Aging Inc: $772,216 over 4y, 57% of budgetThe Madison Voluntary Council on Aging Inc: $703,444 over 4y, 44% of budgetJackson Council on the Aging Inc: $633,986 over 4y, 27% of budgetRichland Voluntary Council on Aging Inc: $616,852 over 4y, 91% of budgetFranklin Council on Aging Inc: $521,856 over 4y, 50% of budgetTensas Council on Aging Inc: $474,843 over 4y, 55% of budgetEast Carroll Council on Aging: $435,158 over 4y, 55% of budgetLegal Services of North Louisiana: $42,379 over 3y, 63% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cenla Area Agency on …Blue Cross & Blue Shi…
Cenla Area Agency on Aging IncLA22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cenla Area Agency on Aging Inc · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc with peer funders

About North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc

How much does North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc give?
North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc reported 9 grants totaling $427,472 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Human Services (94%), Food & Nutrition (5%), Crime & Legal (1%).
Who are North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Union Council on Aging Inc ($772k), The Madison Voluntary Council on Aging Inc ($703k), Jackson Council on the Aging Inc ($634k).
Does North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 22% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Cenla Area Agency on Aging Inc, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation.
Where is North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc based?
North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc is based in LA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on North Delta Regional Planning & Development District’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home