· Public charity
North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc
To provide economic development assistance.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2020.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- $10k–50k8 grants · $168k
- $250k+1 grant · $255k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Bountiful Foods Catering | $255,489 |
| Madison COA | $34,054 |
| Richland VCOA | $25,382 |
| Faith and Hope Independent Li | $25,061 |
| East Carroll VCOA | $23,255 |
| Jackson COA | $17,624 |
| Franklin VCOA | $17,380 |
| Union COA | $14,879 |
| Tensas COA | $10,368 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 38%, against an area that typically sits at 25%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2020, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2020, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $281k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnion Council on Aging Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $772k · revenue +80% · 57% of their budget
- TMThe Madison Voluntary Council on Aging Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $703k · revenue +95% · 44% of their budget
- JCJackson Council on the Aging Inc4× · 2017–2020 · $634k · revenue +35% · 27% of their budget
Funded once
- FHFAITH & HOPE IND LIVINGone grant, 2019 · $55k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes
Non-profit services to the elderly of catahoula parish, la
To deliver services to the elderly of st. mary parish. we are the designated agency (in affiliation with regional & state agencies) for meal services, senior center, homemaker, transportation and similar services to the aging.
To provide services to the elderly age 60 and above in Concordia Parish, La. that enables them to remain at home in their community
To deliver services to the elderly of evangeline parish. we are the designated agency (in affiliation with regional & state agencies) for meal services,senior center, homemaker, transportation and similar services to the aging.
Lincoln council on aging, inc. provides meals, transportation, health and social services to the elderly residents of lincoln parish, louisiana.
To provide activities and services for senior citizens of Dyer County
All programs are designed to deliver services to the elderly of allen parish. we are the designated agency for meal services, senior centers, homemakers, transport and other services to the aging.
To provide services for the elderly age 60 and older of winn parish, la that enable them to remain at home in their commumities for as long as possible following the guidelines set forth in the older americans' act of 1965 and the state of…
To promote the mental social and physical welfare of seniors in Union County SC. To operate senior centers providing group dining home delivered meals transportation homemaker services and material support to seniors 60 and older.
Provides meals and services to senior citizens of the comunity and surrounding towns
To deliver services to the elderly of vermillion parish. we are the designated agency (in affiliation with regional & state agencies) for meal services,senior center, homemaker, transportation and similar services to the aging.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union Council on Aging Inc and the most unlike its peers is Legal Services of North Louisiana. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Union Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds The Madison Voluntary Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds Jackson Council on the Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds Richland Voluntary Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds Franklin Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds Tensas Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds East Carroll Council on Aging ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTH LOUISIANA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cenla Area Agency on Aging Inc · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North Delta Regional Planning & Development District Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.