· Community foundation
North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation
To engage in educational, promotional, and research activities dedicated to the improvement of the beef cattle industry.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $20,900 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $27,150 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE | $12,400 |
| NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S ASSOCIATION | $8,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To engage in educational, promotional, and research activities dedicated to the improvement of the beef cattle industry.
The colorado cattlemen's association's mission is to promote the interests of colorado's beef industry and protect colorado's land, water, and forage resources.
To promote, educate, market and defend the beef industry.
The Cattlemens Congress is an opportunity for breeders across North America to showcase their top genetics and connect with fellow beef producers in a central location, in the heart of cattle country.
To collect and administer the $1 beef checkoff program for the state of south dakota. the beef checkoff program is used to promote, educate and provide research for the benefits of beef.
To advance the business and policy interests of america's cooperatives and other farmer-owned enterprises.
To promote and protect the cattle industry in New Mexico by providing a unified voice on issues of economic importance to the New Mexico cattle industry.
To provide education about the cattle industry.
Support activities improving the red angus breed and developing a higher degree of efficiency in red angus ranching and related agricultural pursuits by supporting youth, research and development, educational, and charitable programs.
To coordinate and advance the economic well being of the Idaho Beef Industry through innovative and effective political,educational, and marketing programs accepted and supported by all industry segments, partners, and coalitions.
Livestock education and research in the cattle industry within Arizona.
Working for nebraska beef producers - pasture to plate.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma Cattlemen's Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Great Plains Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEBRASKA CATTLEMEN DISASTER RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
- Who funds TEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS' FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Kansas Livestock Foundation ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA CATTLEMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CATTLEMEN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation?
Find your warmest path to North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.