How much did NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k1 grant · $12k

$12,400

Median grant

States reached

$4.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

TEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE$12,400
NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S ASSOCIATION$8,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 9%. 90% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation

To engage in educational, promotional, and research activities dedicated to the improvement of the beef cattle industry.

Philanthropy

Colorado Cattlemen's Association

The colorado cattlemen's association promotes the interests of colorado's beef industry and protect colorado's land, water, and forage resources through conventions, conferences, news publications, lobbying, and special project work.

—

South Dakota Beef Industry Council Inc

To collect and administer the $1 beef checkoff program for the state of south dakota. the beef checkoff program is used to promote, educate and provide research for the benefits of beef.

—

National Council of Farmer Cooperatives

Promote interests of cooperative farm industry.

—

New Mexico Cattle Growers Assoc

To promote and protect the cattle industry in New Mexico by providing a unified voice on issues of economic importance to the New Mexico cattle industry.

—

The Western Stock Show Association

Education of livestock production, development of youth, and educating the general public.

Recreation & Sports

Minnesota State Cattlemen's

Promotion of beef industry

—

Kansas Grain and Feed Association

To advance and protect the common interest of its members through effective communication and education to its members, the public and government

—

Kansas Livestock Association

Livestock Industry Promotion & Research

—

North Dakota Soybean Growers Association

The NDSGA advocates for soybean growers at the legislature in Bismarck, through alliance and coalitions. It provides member services while working to recruit and retain members.

—

National Cattlemen's Beef Association

To serve the beef industry by improving the business climate and growing global beef demand.

Community Improvement

Arizona Cattle Growers Association

To provide education about the cattle industry.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers' and the most unlike its peers is Nebraska Cattlemen Disaster Relief Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/8

Grantees still filing

3/8

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$63,956Food & Nutrition$59,965Arts & Culture$14,352

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OKLAHOMA CATTLEMENS FOUNDATI.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~10 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 731135528 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OKLAHOMA CATTLEMENS FOUNDATI, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 10 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation?

Find your warmest path to North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation?

More from the funding graph

NORTH DAKOTA STOCKMEN'S FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to North Dakota Stockmen's Foundation?

More from the funding graph