Skip to content
North Carolina Chamber Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

North Carolina Chamber Foundation

The purpose and mission of the organization is to promote the social welfare of the state of north carolina and its citizens by identifying, investigating, studying, researching, and analyzing in a nonpartisan manner the factors that enhance the business climate, workforce development, and quality of life of the state, including the…

$100k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kPublic Benefit$25kCommunity Improvement$10kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NCAP FOUNDATION INC$50,000
COMMUNITY FOCUS FOUNDATION INC$10,000
MCDOWELL CHAMBER COMMUNITY & BUSINESS IMPACT INC$10,000
HAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BOONE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION$10,000
ASHEVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY BETTERMENT FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TAX FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%NCAP FOUNDATION INC: $50k → 8%HAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%MCDOWELL CHAMBER COMMUNITY & BUSINESS IMPACT INC: $10k → 16%BOONE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: $10k → 21%COMMUNITY FOCUS FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 7 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NCAP FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionNCAP FOUNDATION INCTAX FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitTAX FOUNDATIONBOONE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitBOONE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE …COMMUNITY FOCUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOCUS FO…Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce Community Betterment Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAsheville Area Cha…HAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementHAYWOOD A…MCDOWELL CHAMBER COMMUNITY AND BUSINESS IMPACT: $10,000 · OtherMCDOWELL …
Food & Nutrition$50,000Public Benefit$35,000Philanthropy$20,000Community Improvement$10,000Other$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNCAP FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetTAX FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAYWOOD ADVANCEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOCUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetAsheville Area Chamber of Commerce Community Betterment Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBOONE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North Carolina Chamber Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North Carolina Chamber Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North Carolina Chamber’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home