Skip to content
Foundation Dossiers

Oregon · Private foundation

Norpac Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
2
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Norpac Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to The Oregon Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’20
0
’21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$21,500
Largest grant, FY2021
$21,500
States reached, FY2021
1
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Food & Nutrition$140kPhilanthropy$122kEducation$100k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Agricultural Research Foundation$140,00012%
Oregon State University Foundation$100,00010%

Compare Norpac Foundation with peer funders

About Norpac Foundation

How much does Norpac Foundation give?
Norpac Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $21,500 in its FY2021 IRS filing.
What does Norpac Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (39%), Philanthropy (34%), Education (28%).
Who are Norpac Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: Agricultural Research Foundation ($140k), Oregon State University Foundation ($100k).
Does Norpac Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Where is Norpac Foundation based?
Norpac Foundation is based in OR.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Norpac’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home