Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nora Tertzag Hampar Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$523k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$397kEducation$373kReligion$341kArts & Culture$175kYouth Development$125kHuman Services$120kHealth$115kFood & Nutrition$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $181k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$126,000
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION$55,000
ARMENIAN EYE CARE PROJECT$35,000
FRIENDS OF GOALS$25,000
TUMO FOUNDATION$25,000
FRIENDS OF TEACH FOR ARMENIA$25,000
UNITED ARMENIAN CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$25,000
ARMENIAN TECHNOLOGY GROUP$25,000
CIVILITAS FOUNDATION$25,000
WOMEN SUPPORT CENTER - ARMENIA$25,000
EVN NEWS FOUNDATION$25,000
C & E MERDINIAN SCHOOL$20,000
LARK MUSICAL SOCIETY$20,000
CAMP AREV-ARMENIAN EVANGELICAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA$20,000
HAIGAZIAN UNIVERSITY SUPPORT$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN SUPPORT CENTER - ARMENIA: $25k → 4%WOMEN SUPPORT CENTER - ARMENIA: $25k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Nora Tertzag Hampar Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 52% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 48%.

Nora Tertzag Hampar Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 18 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -63% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$1.8M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-63%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $205k · revenue +18%
  • TA
    THE ARMENIAN EYECARE PROJECT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $115k · revenue +76%
  • AT
    ARMENIAN TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +274% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • HU
    HAIGAZIAN UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -63%
  • WS
    WOMEN SUPPORT CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Armenian Sports Hall of Fame
—
2
Armenian Center for Contemporary Experimental Art Inc

To promote armenian contemporary experimental art

Arts & Culture
3
Armenian Educational Foundation

Providing grants that contribute to the goals of armenian education and heritage

Arts & Culture
4
The Voice of the Armenian Church Inc
—
5
Arahed Foundation Inc

The foundation aims to improve access to quality healthcare by strengthening the healthcare system in armenia.

Health
6
New York Armenian Home Inc
Human Services
7
Global Arm Foundation

Education about armenia & caucasu region

Philanthropy
8
Armenian Professional Society Scholarship Fund

Further education

Arts & Culture
9
Armenian Film Society

Armenian film society celebrates armenian culture through year-round programming of film screenings, discussions, workshop, and lectures. it shines a spotlight on armenian films and filmmakers, as week as films that deal with armenian…

Arts & Culture
10
Armenia Hearing Aid Project

Provide hearing aids and education

Health
11
Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights

Alc seeks to secure justice for those who have suffered war crimes as a result of the unprovoked attack by azerbaijan on nagorno-karabagh during 2020 and 2023 including bringing cases, working with other not-for-profits, before the…

International
12
Armenian Eagles Foundation

We help rural areas of armenia with struggling businesses and infrastructure by providing families with business support in order to help promote growth, build sustainable businesses, and enhance the quality of living for those impacted.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Teach for Armenia Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Goals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $396,667 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCAMP AREV-ARMENIAN EVANGELICAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA: $201,000 · OtherCAMP AREV-ARMENIAN EVANGELICAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICAARMENIAN MISSIONARY ASSOC OF AMER INC: $90,000 · OtherARMENIAN MISSIONARY ASSOC OF AMER INCCIVILITAS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherCIVILITAS FOUNDATIONEVN NEWS FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherEVN NEWS FOUNDATIONUNITED ARMENIAN CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $50,000 · Other+5 more: $71,500 · Other+5 moreAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION: $205,000 · EducationAMERICAN UNIVERSITY…FRIENDS OF TEACH FOR ARMENIA INCORPORATED: $75,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF TEACH FO…HAIGAZIAN UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FUND INC: $50,000 · EducationHAIGAZIAN UNIVERSIT…ARMENIAN TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC: $100,000 · InternationalARMENIAN TE…CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $75,000 · InternationalCHILDREN OF…ARMENIAN WOUNDED HEROES FUND INC: $20,000 · InternationalARMENIAN WO…THE ARMENIAN EYECARE PROJECT: $115,000 · HealthTHE ARMEN…ARARAT HOME OF LOS ANGELES: $45,000 · HealthARARAT HO…LARK MUSICAL SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureArmenian American Museum and Cultural Center of California: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTUMO FOUNDATION: $75,000 · PhilanthropyWOMENS SUPPORT CENTER-ARMENIA: $50,000 · Human ServicesFriends of GOALS Inc: $50,000 · Youth Development
Other$959,167Education$330,000International$195,000Health$160,000Arts & Culture$100,000Philanthropy$75,000Human Services$50,000Youth Development$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION: $205,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ARMENIAN EYECARE PROJECT: $115,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetARMENIAN TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC: $100,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetCHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF: $75,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTUMO FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF TEACH FOR ARMENIA INCORPORATED: $75,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetLARK MUSICAL SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHAIGAZIAN UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWOMENS SUPPORT CENTER-ARMENIA: $50,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetArmenian American Museum and Cultural Center of California: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFriends of GOALS Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetARARAT HOME OF LOS ANGELES: $45,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARMENIAN WOUNDED HEROES FUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF ARMENIA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ARMENIAN EYECARE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND INC DBA CHILDREN OF ARMENIA FUND COAF ↗
  • Who funds TUMO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF TEACH FOR ARMENIA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds LARK MUSICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds HAIGAZIAN UNIVERSITY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS SUPPORT CENTER-ARMENIA ↗
  • Who funds Armenian American Museum and Cultural Center of California ↗
  • Who funds Friends of GOALS Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARARAT HOME OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds ARMENIAN WOUNDED HEROES FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jhm Charitable FoundationCA26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jhm Charitable Foundation · George Ignatius Foundation · The Vahik & Alice Petrossian Foundation · The Stephen Philibosian Foundation · The Gaska Alliance Foundation · Bedrosian Foundation · Levon & Claudia Nazarian Family Foundation Inc (Levon Nazarian Fd'N) · The Armen and Gloria Hampar Family Foundation · Afeyan Family Foundation · Ucla Foundation · Ayvazian Family Foundation · Dickranian Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nora Tertzag Hampar Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nora Tertzag Hampar Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nora Tertzag Hampar Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Nora Tertzag Hampar Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nora Tertzag Hampar’s filings →

    More from the funding graph