Skip to content

· Public charity

Nonprofit Enterprise at Work Inc

NEW inspires and equips mission-driven people, organizations and communities to realize their visions of a just and thriving society.

$291k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$213k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Employment$310kHuman Services$213kFood & Nutrition$155kArts & Culture$143kCivil Rights$32kScience & Tech$27kEducation$15kCrime & Legal$15kOther$0
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $275,215, the rows itemized in this filing. The $290,736 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,521 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $213k
$14,529
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Washtenaw Care-Based Safety$213,252
Michigan Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Network$25,000
Black Men Read$14,529
Willlis Patterson Our Own Thing Chorale$14,064
Mentor2Youth$8,370
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $213k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Washtenaw Care-Based Safety: $213k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 4 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +352% since the first grant, against +133% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$462k
$229k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+352%
+133%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $238k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTER
    2× · 2019–2020 · $310k · revenue +352%
  • BM
    Black Men Read
    4× · 2020–2023 · $93k
  • WP
    WILLIS PATTERSON OUR OWN THING CHORALE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $44k

Funded once

  • WC
    Washtenaw Cty Black Farmers Fd
    one grant, 2022 · $105k
  • WT
    WE THE PEOPLE OPPORTUNITY FARM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $21k · revenue +133%
  • BC
    Bottles-N-Backpacks CDC Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Washtenaw Cty Black Farmers Fd: $105,291 · OtherWashtenaw Cty Black Farmers FdBlack Men Read: $93,069 · OtherBlack Men ReadWILLIS PATTERSON OUR OWN THING CHORALE: $44,415 · OtherWILLIS PATTERSON OUR OWN THING CHORALEBottles-N-Backpacks CDC Inc: $20,000 · OtherBottles-N-Backpacks CDC IncNewFoundry Labs LLC: $20,000 · OtherNewFoundry Labs LLCIndividual grant recipient: $19,854 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWashtenaw Justice Project: $14,900 · Other+4 more: $28,100 · Other+4 moreINDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTER: $309,500 · EducationINDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTERMENTOR2YOUTH INC: $15,390 · EducationWashtenaw Care-Based Safety: $213,252 · Human ServicesWashtenaw Care-Based Safe…MICHIGAN UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIAL JUSTICE NETWORK: $25,000 · Civil RightsWE THE PEOPLE OPPORTUNITY FARM INC: $21,185 · Crime & Legal
Other$345,629Education$324,890Human Services$213,252Civil Rights$25,000Crime & Legal$21,185

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTER: $309,500 over 2y, 21% of budgetWashtenaw Care-Based Safety: $213,252 over 1y, 27% of budgetMICHIGAN UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIAL JUSTICE NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetWE THE PEOPLE OPPORTUNITY FARM INC: $21,185 over 1y, 11% of budgetMENTOR2YOUTH INC: $15,390 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetBLACK MICROBIOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION: $6,613 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDUSTRIAL SEWING AND INNOVATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Washtenaw Care-Based Safety ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST SOCIAL JUSTICE NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds WE THE PEOPLE OPPORTUNITY FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTOR2YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK MICROBIOLOGISTS ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

United Way for Southeastern MichiganMI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way for Southeastern Michigan

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nonprofit Enterprise at Work Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nonprofit Enterprise at Work Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nonprofit Enterprise at Work’s filings →

    More from the funding graph