Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nodak Sportsmens Club

Organizations mission or most significant activities include outdoor opportunities for youth, handicapped indivduals, and veterans.

$172k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Recreation & Sports$115kReligion$89kAnimals$36kCommunity Improvement$28kEducation$28kYouth Development$22kArts & Culture$22kHuman Services$11kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $29,060 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $171,535 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $142,475 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $18k
$5,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER COMMUNITY CLUB$18,060
UNDERWOOD MID SUMMER CLASSIC$5,500
FURRY FRIENDS ROCKIN RESCUE$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VOYAGEURS INTERNATIONAL: $6k → 7%RICHARDTON-TAYLOR SCHOOL: $12k → 9%CENTER COMMUNITY CLUB: $18k → 10%BISMARCK RECREATIONAL COUNCIL: $50k → 10%HEBRON SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER: $6k → 10%UNDERWOOD MID SUMMER CLASSIC: $6k → 10%KILLDEER SCHOOL FOOTBALL: $6k → 11%BIG HEART CHURCH: $6k → 12%CITY OF DEERING: $7k → 12%DSU HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6k → 9%CENTER COMMUNITY CLUB: $10k → 10%LIGHT OF CHRIST: $25k → 10%HEBRON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $6k → 10%RIVERDALE AMBULANCE: $9k → 10%CLOSE UP FOUNDATION KILLDEER: $5k → 11%LIGHT OF CHRIST: $25k → 10%ZION LUTHERN CHURCH: $8k → 10%HALLIDAY RURAL FIRE: $11k → 11%CAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUN CLUB: $22k → 10%HEBRON PARK BOARD: $6k → 10%DAKOTA WEST ARTS COUNCIL: $22k → 10%FLASHER PUBLIC SCHOOL: $10k → 10%DELTA WATERFOWL: $11k → 10%MANDAN PARKS AND RECREATIONAL: $25k → 10%BISMARCK RECREATIONAL COUNCIL: $10k → 10%APPLE CREEK COUNTRY CLUB: $5k → 10%CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION: $26k → 10%BISMARCK PARKS & RECREATION: $13k → 10%MIKE AIDE BENEFIT: $9k → 10%DRISCOLL BETTERMENT CLUB: $5k → 10%STERLING LIONS CLUB: $8k → 10%STERLING LIONS CLUB: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

37%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$152k · 4 repeat orgs$258k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
24

Total granted

$152k
$247k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-100%
+11%

Still filing today

25%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BR
    BISMARCK RECREATIONAL COUNCIL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k
  • LO
    LIGHT OF CHRIST
    2× · 2017–2018 · $50k
  • CC
    Center Community Club Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $28k · revenue -100% · 59% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION
    one grant, 2019 · $26k
  • MP
    MANDAN PARKS AND RECREATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • CC
    CAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUN CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $22k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BISMARCK RECREATIONAL COUNCIL — $60,033 · OtherBISMARCK RECREATIONAL COUNCILLIGHT OF CHRIST — $50,000 · OtherLIGHT OF CHRISTCenter Community Club Inc — $27,872 · OtherCenter Community Club IncCHURCH OF THE ASCENSION — $25,700 · OtherCHURCH OF THE ASCENSIONMANDAN PARKS AND RECREATIONAL — $25,000 · OtherMANDAN PARKS AND RECREATIONALCAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUN CLUB — $22,181 · OtherCAPITAL CITY YOUNG GUN CLUBSTERLING LIONS CLUB — $14,050 · OtherBismarck Parks & Recreation — $13,143 · Other+18 more — $127,972 · Other+18 moreDAKOTA WEST ARTS COUNCIL INC — $22,000 · Arts & CultureDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $10,600 · AnimalsFURRY FRIENDS ROCKIN' RESCUE INC — $5,500 · AnimalsDSU HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Education
Other$365,951Arts & Culture$22,000Animals$16,100Education$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCenter Community Club Inc — $27,872 over 2y, 59% of budgetDelta Waterfowl Foundation — $10,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDSU HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFURRY FRIENDS ROCKIN' RESCUE INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Center Community Club Inc
  • Who funds DAKOTA WEST ARTS COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Delta Waterfowl Foundation
  • Who funds DSU HERITAGE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FURRY FRIENDS ROCKIN' RESCUE INC

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nodak Sportsmens Club funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $238k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph