Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

California · Public charity

No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes

To oppose measures to increase real property transfer taxes on the November 8, 2022 ballot in the City of Santa Monica, CA.

$20k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
Organizations funded FY2022
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2022
$19,592
Largest grant, FY2022
$19,592
States reached, FY2022
1

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2022 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Center for Jobs and the Economy$19,59216%

Compare No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes with peer funders

About No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes

How much does No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes give?
No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes reported 1 grants totaling $19,592 in its FY2022 IRS filing.
What does No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes fund?
By grant dollars over FY2022 to FY2022, its largest causes are Employment (100%).
Who are No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2022 to FY2022: Center for Jobs and the Economy ($20k).
Where is No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes based?
No on Measures DT & GS - Santa Monicans Against Ridiculous Taxes is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home