Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nikipro Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$537kHealth$212kRecreation & Sports$90kYouth Development$25kArts & Culture$11kEducation$10kReligion$5kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CURTIS NATIONAL HAND CENTER AT MEDSTAR UNION MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$34,965
ASHLEY TREATMENT CENTER$15,000
MS SOCIETY OF NORTH CAROLINA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $245k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FDN: $50k → 7%FOSTERING CHANGE NETWORK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WBAL KIDS CAMPAIGN: $10k → 19%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FDN: $50k → 7%WBAL KIDS CAMPAIGN: $10k → 19%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FDN: $50k → 7%WBAL KIDS CAMPAIGN: $5k → 19%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FDN: $50k → 7%BOULDER CREST RETREAT FDN: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$861k · 10 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
6

Total granted

$861k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+31%

Still filing today

40%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Operation Second Chance Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $315k · revenue +182%
  • BC
    BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $210k · revenue +34%
  • KC
    KIDS CAMPAIGN INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $25k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • YS
    YOUTH SPORTS ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • FC
    Fostering Change Network Foundation
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • UC
    UNITY CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL GROWTH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital Area Food Bank Inc

The mission of the capital area food bank (the food bank or cafb) is to help our neighbors thrive by creating more equitable access to food and opportunity through community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
2
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
3
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
4
Blue Ridge Area Food Bank Inc

The food bank purchases food and obtains donations of food from the united states department of agriculture, manufacturers, distributors, retailers, growers and community members for distribution to people in need in 25 counties and eight…

—
5
Manna Food Center Inc

Manna food center, inc strives to end hunger in our community through education, advocacy, and food distribution to individuals and partner agencies. manna's guiding principles are to be service-driven, community- centered and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Military Officers Association of America

Preserve and protect earned benefits for our uniformed services, veterans, their families, and surviving spouses through advocacy, leadership, education and service. provide first-class service to our members. we are the leading voice on…

Public Benefit
7
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
8
Chester County Food Bank

We mobilize and educate our community to ensure equitable access to nutritious and familiar food. we do this by raising, and soliciting funds for the acquisition, storage, growing, collection and distribution of food to low income citizens…

Food & Nutrition
9
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
10
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boulder Crest Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Maryland Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CURTIS NATIONAL HAND CENTER AT MEDSTAR UNION MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $160,000 · OtherTHE CURTIS NATIONAL HAND CENTER AT MEDST…NICHOLAS BRAMBLE IRONMAN FOUNDATION MID-SHORE COMMUNITY FDN: $50,000 · OtherNICHOLAS BRAMBLE IRONMAN FOUNDATION MID-…ASHLEY TREATMENT CENTER: $40,000 · OtherASHLEY TREATMENT CENTERUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO-ATHLETICS: $30,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBO…+5 more: $36,500 · Other+5 moreOperation Second Chance Inc: $315,000 · Public BenefitOperation Second Chance IncBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $210,000 · Human ServicesBOULDER CREST FOUNDATIONKIDS CAMPAIGN INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesKIDS CAMPAIGN INCFostering Change Network Foundation: $10,000 · Human ServicesSHELL MUSEUM AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · Arts & CultureSHAREBABY INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $2,000 · Health
Other$316,500Public Benefit$315,000Human Services$245,000Arts & Culture$12,500Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOperation Second Chance Inc: $315,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetBOULDER CREST FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetKIDS CAMPAIGN INC: $25,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetSHELL MUSEUM AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHAREBABY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Operation Second Chance Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER CREST FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
  • Who funds SHELL MUSEUM AND EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fostering Change Network Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SHAREBABY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nikipro Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nikipro Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nikipro Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Nikipro Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nikipro’s filings →

More from the funding graph