· Public charity
New York State Nurses Association
The organization's mission is to promote the advancement of nursing through collective bargaining and to improve the public's health by providing advocacy and leadership in the changing healthcare environment.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $120,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $165,498 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $45,498 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORKING FAMILIES PARTY INC | $60,000 |
| NEW YORK RELIEF NETWORK | $50,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS USA INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +861% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- URUE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FUND4× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue ×20
- CJCLIMATE JOBS NY INC4× · 2019–2022 · $55k · revenue +861%
- MNMASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION2× · 2019–2021 · $30k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- NSNY State Democractic Committee Housekeeping Acctone grant, 2018 · $100k
- NPNYSNA POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURES)one grant, 2019 · $92k
- FIFAHWA INCone grant, 2018 · $65k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH) is a membership organization of workers, unions, community-based organizations, workers' rights activists, and health and safety professionals. NYCOSH uses training,…
To build a worker-led movement to hold healthcare corporations accountable to the public interest, improve the lives of caregivers and patients and enable quality affordable healthcare for all.
1199seiu - to organize and unite employees in the health care industry.
Labor union to support collective bargaining for its members, conducting membership meetings, education, organizing events to further the common interests of the membership.
The organization is a trade union that represents operating engineers, who work as heavy equipment operators, mechanics,and surveyors in the construction industry, and stationary engineers, who work in operations and maintenance in…
Labor union to support collective bargaining for its members, conducting membership meetings, education, organizing events to further the common interests of the membership.
Working to build an effective and equitable health care system for every new yorker. (see sch. o)
Participate in contract negotiations, arbitrate cases and all other activities to support union members.
The organization's mission is to promote the advancement of nursing through collective bargaining and to improve the public's health by providing advocacy and leadership in the changing healthcare environment.
Labor organization providing member services, negotiates compensation, benefits and working conditions.
To develop and lead the member local unions' strategy and program across local unions, industries and geographies to build power and win justice for workers, their families and their communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Climate Jobs Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is Riverkeeper Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds FAHWA INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE JOBS NY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK RELIEF NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMISSION ON THE PUBLICS HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds LABOR CAMPAIGN FOR SINGLE PAYER HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA NURSES ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RIVERKEEPER INC ↗
- Who funds ROSCOE CARES INC ↗
- Who funds 81359 LOCAL ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New York State Nurses Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Nurses Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.