Skip to content

· Public charity

New York Institute of Technology

NEW YORK INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on schedule o)

$86M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$78k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Science & Tech$860kEducation$453kHealth$266kYouth Development$95k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $261,688, the rows itemized in this filing. The $86,063,839 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $85,802,151 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $98k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $151k
$32,043
Median grant
7
States reached
$588M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM$78,326
RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY$73,087
SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSITITUTE$36,784
THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH$32,043
RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY$18,339
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$11,140
CURATORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI$6,000
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY$5,969
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $46k → 11%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE: $89k → 16%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $120k → 10%Penn State University: $88k → 16%SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSITITUTE: $61k → 11%Feinstein Institute for Medical Research: $21k → 6%THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY: $16k → 7%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $63k → 17%Arkansas State University- Jonesboro: $26k → 17%University of Iowa: $10k → 15%BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $92k → 10%THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $95k → 8%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY: $73k → 8%The University of South Dakota: $15k → 20%CERNO BIOSCIENCE LLC: $41k → 13%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE: $83k → 16%SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSITITUTE: $55k → 11%The Research Fdn for The State Uni of NY: $9k → 7%THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $42k → 17%BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $78k → 10%THE UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $32k → 8%RUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY: $22k → 8%CERNO BIOSCIENCE LLC: $14k → 13%ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 11%TRUSTEES OF TUFTS COLLEGE: $58k → 16%Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute: $46k → 11%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $48k → 17%BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $41k → 10%SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSITITUTE: $45k → 11%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $30k → 17%BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM: $26k → 10%SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSITITUTE: $37k → 11%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $13k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $11k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY: $61k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY: $18k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY: $12k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY: $11k → 17%RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CUNY: $6k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
NV
SD
IA
PA
NJ
CA
UT
MO
AZ
AR
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 10 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$326k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+28%

Still filing today

40%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    3× · 2022–2024 · $230k · revenue +9%
  • SB
    SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $199k · revenue +7%
  • RF
    Research Foundation of the City University of New York
    5× · 2021–2025 · $108k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue +7%
  • PS
    PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $88k
  • SB
    Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
    one grant, 2019 · $46k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Wisconsin Madison: $237,956 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonUNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $126,679 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY: $95,245 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITYPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $87,755 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY: $57,078 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYCERNO BIOSCIENCE LLC: $54,871 · OtherCERNO BIOSCIENCE LLCSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute: $46,211 · OtherSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute+5 more: $82,737 · Other+5 moreTrustees of Tufts College: $229,978 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $120,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $108,455 · EducationResearch Foundation of the City University of…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $104,719 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CI…New York University: $102,561 · EducationNew York UniversitySANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $198,679 · HealthSANFORD BURNHA…THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $20,878 · HealthTHE FEINSTEIN …
Other$788,532Education$665,713Health$219,557

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $229,978 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE: $198,679 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $120,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York: $108,455 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $104,719 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $102,561 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH: $20,878 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds THE FEINSTEIN INSTITUTES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New York Institute of Technology funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New York Institute of Technology. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New York Institute of Technology’s filings →

More from the funding graph