Skip to content

· Public charity

New Voices Foundation

To empower emerging women of color entrepreneurs with the support they need to be successful and help them realize their potential and transform their communities through commerce.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
0161% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$337kYouth Development$148kCommunity Improvement$94kHealth$81kEnvironment$68kFood & Nutrition$50kReligion$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $132,694, the rows itemized in this filing. The $173,694 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $41,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$17,194
Median grant
1
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VONTELLE LLC$76,500
AWKWARD GAMES LLC$25,000
CARDIOCEPH LLC$17,194
BEHR HEALTH SYSTEMS INC$7,000
4D HEALTHWARE LLC$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 10% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNDEFINED BEAUTY: $50k → 14%AGUA BONITA: $25k → 18%SUGARDOH: $100k → 7%OH LAIT OH LAIT: $10k → 16%UNDEFINED BEAUTY: $34k → 14%AGUA BONITA: $13k → 18%SGM LLC (BEST TODAY): $25k → 7%SGM LLC (BEST TODAY): $25k → 7%PEAK AND VALLEY: $100k → 7%PECULIAR ROOTS LLC: $100k → 7%SCOTCH BOYZ: $67k → 7%KAZMALEJE: $67k → 7%PEAK AND VALLEY: $50k → 7%MOCKTAILS DBA MUMTAILS LLC: $50k → 7%KAEESS NAIL POLISH: $28k → 7%SPENDDEBT: $25k → 7%MOODEAUX: $25k → 7%FLORA AND NOOR: $25k → 7%PHOLK BEAUTY: $25k → 7%NUEKIE INC: $25k → 7%CHURCHSPACE: $25k → 7%EMBLEM OLIVE OIL: $20k → 7%NANA FOODS LLC: $15k → 7%UNDEFINED BEAUTY: $15k → 7%BLK GREEN: $15k → 7%FAIR FARE: $15k → 7%WANDERSTAY HOTELS: $15k → 7%CULTURE CARE: $15k → 7%PUPWAX: $15k → 7%NANA FOODS LLC: $15k → 7%LIMELOOP: $13k → 7%BLACK GIRLS BREATHING: $13k → 7%PARTAKE FOODS: $13k → 7%NATAKALLAM LLC: $10k → 7%EMBLEM OLIVE OIL: $10k → 7%CHILON INDUSTRIES: $10k → 7%BLACK GIRL SUNSCREEN: $10k → 7%ANAITTE INC: $10k → 7%NOPALERA: $10k → 7%STRATTYX INC: $10k → 7%RANGE BEAUTY: $10k → 7%FRIA LLC: $10k → 7%BERRY BISSAP (MAMPRO): $10k → 7%SHAMPOOTIME: $10k → 7%MAGNUS MODE: $8k → 7%PRAXIS LABS: $8k → 7%BABYPALOOZA: $8k → 7%KIIRA HEALTH INC: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of New Voices Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 0%.

New Voices Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$385k · 7 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
74

Total granted

$385k
$1.2M

Still filing today

0%
3%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $150k
  • UB
    UNDEFINED BEAUTY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $84k
  • AB
    AGUA BONITA
    2× · 2022–2023 · $38k

Funded once

  • PR
    PECULIAR ROOTS LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • S
    SUGARDOH
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
2/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPECULIAR ROOTS LLC: $100,000 · OtherPECULIAR ROOTS LLCSUGARDOH: $100,000 · OtherSUGARDOHUNDEFINED BEAUTY: $84,000 · OtherVONTELLE LLC: $76,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $67,000 · OtherKAZMALEJE: $67,000 · Other+77 more: $1,018,594 · Other+77 morePraxis Inc: $7,500 · Religion
Other$1,738,094Religion$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPraxis Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Voices Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Voices Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Voices Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to New Voices Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Voices’ filings →

    More from the funding graph