Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

NEW VISION FOUNDATION dba YAKIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOC

Enhance the income, quality of life and employment stability of yakima county residents by retaining, expanding, and recruiting business and industry.

$509k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $80,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $509,444 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $429,444 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ESTRADAS AUTO BODY AND SALES$10,000
REVIVE WELLNESS AND TANNING$10,000
EL RAY TACOS$10,000
FONDA EL HABANERO LLC$10,000
CASA VITTORE COFFEE$10,000
DRINKN GAMES$10,000
LASH AND MAKEUP STUDIO$10,000
DIVINE PERFORMANCE & TECHNIQU$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CASA VITTORE COFFEE: $10k → 17%LASH AND MAKEUP STUDIO: $10k → 17%ESTRADAS AUTO BODY AND SALES: $10k → 17%FONDA EL HABANERO LLC: $10k → 17%EL RAY TACOS: $10k → 17%DRINKN GAMES: $10k → 17%DIVINE PERFORMANCE & TECHNIQU: $10k → 17%REVIVE WELLNESS AND TANNING: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2021–2021.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20212021, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ESTRADAS AUTO BODY AND SALES — $10,000 · OtherESTRADAS AUTO BODY AND SALESDIVINE PERFORMANCE & TECHNIQU — $10,000 · OtherDIVINE PERFORMANCE & TECHNIQUFONDA EL HABANERO LLC — $10,000 · OtherFONDA EL HABANERO LLCEL RAY TACOS — $10,000 · OtherEL RAY TACOSLASH AND MAKEUP STUDIO — $10,000 · OtherLASH AND MAKEUP STUDIOREVIVE WELLNESS AND TANNING — $10,000 · OtherREVIVE WELLNESS AND TANNINGDRINKN GAMES — $10,000 · OtherDRINKN GAMESCASA VITTORE COFFEE — $10,000 · OtherCASA VITTORE COFFEE
Other$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph