Skip to content
New Science Research Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New Science Research Inc

To facilitate scientific breakthroughs by empowering the next generation of scientists and building the 21st century institutions of basic science.

$577k
Granted FY2022
7
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$141k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Health$316kEducation$214kScience & Tech$20k
02FY2022 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $529,565, the rows itemized in this filing. The $577,065 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $47,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $89k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $440k
$69,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$141,000
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$130,000
ARC RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION$69,300
REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY$36,465
HARVARD MANAGEMENT COMPANY$36,300
BRAOD INSTITUTE$16,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BRAOD INSTITUTE: $17k → 8%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $69k → 16%ARC RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $100k → 8%REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY: $36k → 10%BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $130k → 8%HARVARD MANAGEMENT COMPANY: $36k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $141k → 8%HARVARD COLLEGE: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
3/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $141,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUN…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $36,465 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATIONHarvard Management Company Inc: $36,300 · EducationHarvard Management Company IncPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $20,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard CollegeArc Research Institute: $100,000 · HealthArc Research InstituteChildren's Hospital Corporation: $69,300 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationThe Broad Institute Inc: $16,500 · HealthThe Broad Institute IncMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $130,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCOR…
Education$233,765Health$185,800Other$130,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $141,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArc Research Institute: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $69,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $36,465 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarvard Management Company Inc: $36,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $16,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Science Research Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Science Research Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to New Science Research Inc?

Find your warmest path to New Science Research Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $98k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New Science Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home