Skip to content

· Public charity

New Oxford Social & Athletic Club

The organizations exempt purpose is to provide and maintain a place for fellow members to congregate and enjoy the camaraderie of fellow members.

$218k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $78,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $217,795 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $139,295 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $36k
$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED HOOK & LADDER CO$36,000
PEOPLE WHO CARE INC$8,400
NEW OXFORD CHEERLEADING BOOSTERS$6,600
NEW OXFORD HIGH SCHOOL$6,500
ROOTS FOR BOOTS$5,700
BERMUDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,300
GOOD OLD TAILS SENIOR ANIMAL RESCUE$5,000
MAKE A WISH$5,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BERMUDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5k → 9%GOOD OLD TAILS SENIOR ANIMAL RESCUE: $5k → 9%UNITED HOOK & LADDER CO: $36k → 9%MAKE A WISH: $5k → 9%PEOPLE WHO CARE INC: $8k → 9%ROOTS FOR BOOTS: $6k → 9%NEW OXFORD CHEERLEADING BOOSTERS: $7k → 9%NEW OXFORD HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oxford Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Rescue

Public Safety & Disaster
2
North Penn Volunteer Fire Company

To provide protection and emergency medical services to residents of north wales borough, lower gwynedd township, upper gwynedd township and surrounding communities.

—
3
Wexford Volunteer Fire Company No 1 of Pine Township

To provide fire protection services to the community.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
West Alexander Volunteer Fire Department

It is the mission of the west alexander volunteer fire department to deliver, in a competent and professional mann, a combination of proactive and reactive fire, rescue, and emergency services that will provide the highest degree of…

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Central Volunteer Fire Department

Operation of a volunteer fire company for the local communities in pike county, pa.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Marklesburg Volunteer Fire Company Number 1

Fire protection service for the marklesburg area

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Penn Volunteer Fire Department

All volunteer fire department provides fire and rescue services to the surrounding communities.

—
8
New Manchester Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Fire fighting

—
9
Newmansville Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer Fire Department dedicated to protecting life and property by providing the community with fire prevention and educational programs.

Public Safety & Disaster
10
The Waverly Volunteer Fire Company Inc

To provide Fire, Rescue, Medical and Emergency services to the community.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Monroeton Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer Fire & Safety Protection for the Community

Public Safety & Disaster
12
North Belle Volunteer Volunteer Fire Department

Fire department servicing the Belle Vernon and surrounding areas

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Hook & Ladder Company #33; the most unlike its peers is New Oxford Cheerleading Boosters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED HOOK & LADDER COMPANY #33: $36,000 · EducationUNITED HOOK & LADDER COMPANY #33PEOPLE WHO CARE INC: $8,400 · OtherPEOPLE WHO CARE INCNEW OXFORD HIGH SCHOOL: $6,500 · OtherNEW OXFORD HIGH SCHOOLBERMUDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT: $5,300 · OtherBERMUDIAN SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICTGOOD OLD TAILS SENIOR ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,000 · OtherGOOD OLD TAILS SENIOR ANIMAL RESCUEMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $5,000 · OtherMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and We…New Oxford Cheerleading Boosters: $6,600 · Youth DevelopmentNew Oxfor…ROOTS FOR BOOTS: $5,700 · Public Benefit
Education$36,000Other$30,200Youth Development$6,600Public Benefit$5,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED HOOK & LADDER COMPANY #33: $36,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMake-A-Wish Foundation of Greater PA and West Virginia Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Oxford Social & Athletic Club funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Oxford Social & Athletic Club. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Oxford Social & Athletic Club?

    Find your warmest path to New Oxford Social & Athletic Club through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Oxford Social & Athletic Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph