Skip to content
New Life Foundation International Inc at a glance

· Public charity

New Life Foundation International Inc

The purpose of this organization is (1) to provide opportunities for education to underdeveloped, unreached children around the world, (2) to provide medicines and medical service to the people unmet medical cares, and

$102k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Religion$372kEducation$284kInternational$80kHealth$20kCommunity Improvement$17kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $96,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $101,624 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $5,624 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$32,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MISSION UKRAINE$35,000
BIOLA UNIVERSITY$32,000
DOULOS COMMUNITY CHURCH$17,000
DOOREH MISSION$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%MSARANG MISSION: $48k → 10%JESUS FELLOWSHIP: $36k → 14%INTL EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION: $10k → 5%DURANNO FATHER SCHOOL: $16k → 9%M SARANG MISSION: $22k → 10%SERVE AND GIVE MISSION: $10k → 14%INTL EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION: $10k → 5%BUILD BRIDGE PARTNERS: $10k → 10%SERVE AND GIVE MISSION: $10k → 14%INTERNATIONAL EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION: $10k → 5%BUILDER BRIDGE PARTNERS: $6k → 10%DOOREH MISSION: $12k → 14%INTERNATIONAL EVANGELICAL ASSOCIATION: $10k → 5%GRACE MISSION UNIVERSITY: $7k → 10%DOOREH MISSION: $10k → 14%SA-RANG COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 10%DOOREH MISSION: $10k → 14%SA-RANG COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 10%ITW: $25k → 14%MISSION UKRAINE: $77k → 10%DOOREH MISSION: $10k → 14%MISSION UKRAINE: $69k → 10%ITW: $10k → 14%MISSION UKRAINE: $35k → 10%BIOLA UNIVERSITY: $200k → 14%MISSION UKRAINE: $25k → 10%AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%MERCY STRIDE INTERNATIONAL: $7k → 10%LGES: $10k → 14%MISSION UKRAINE: $13k → 10%BIOLA UNIVERSITY: $32k → 14%AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $10k → 14%M SARANG: $10k → 14%DOULOS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $17k → 14%ZION MISSION CHURCH: $25k → 14%DOULOS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 20% of New Life Foundation International Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 90% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 71%.

New Life Foundation International Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$556k · 10 repeat orgs$323k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

$556k
$323k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-1%

Still filing today

40%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’24’25
EducationReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MISSION UKRAINE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $251k · revenue +36%
  • ES
    ESCUELA SARANG
    4× · 2019–2024 · $80k · revenue -69% · 49% of their budget
  • DM
    DOOREH MISSION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $42k

Funded once

  • BU
    BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $200k · revenue -1%
  • JF
    JESUS FELLOWSHIP
    one grant, 2019 · $36k
  • ZM
    ZION MISSION CHURCH
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sagos Institute of Preaching and Bible Exposition

The mission of our school can be divided into 4 areas:1.To cultivate students exegesis & preaching of the Scriptures rightly based on truth found in Bible. 2.To edify Bible study talents to teach Bible and lead Bible study as the focus of…

Education
2
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
3
California Prestige University

Presbyterian theological seminary in america exists to servce the korean presbyterian church abroad (kpca) and the kingdom of god by equipping students for effective service to god, his church, and the world he sends us to evangelize.

—
4
Europe Campus Ministry

The Organization is formed for Christian evangelism and discipleship training as afundamentalist, evangelical, and non-denominational faith-based missionorganization. Its mission is to reach out to students with the whole of gospel ofJesus…

Religion
5
International Theological Seminary

To provide a center for the study of theology and ministry in evangelical persuasion based upon the infallible and interrant inspired word of God in the bible.

—
6
Grateful Shepherd Ministries

Training pastors and leaders in christian faith

Religion
7
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
8
Seminario Reformado Latinoamericano

Srl trains ministry leaders to proclaim the gospel, equip believers, and build up the body of christ across the spanish-speaking world through reformed theological education.

Religion
9
Campus Mission International North America

Religious

Religion
10
Instituto De Estudios Teologicos

Conference

Education
11
G2G Center

Curriculum development and distribution & Christian Leadership Training

Religion
12
Alongside Education Ministries Inc

Pastor training

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Azusa Pacific University; the most unlike its peers is Escuela Sarang. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DOOREH MISSION: $42,000 · OtherDOOREH MISSIONINTERNATIONAL EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL EVANGELISM ASSOCIATIO…JESUS FELLOWSHIP: $36,000 · OtherJESUS FELLOWSHIPITW: $35,000 · OtherITWDOULOS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $32,000 · OtherDOULOS COMMUNITY CHURCHZION MISSION CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherZION MISSION CHURCHSA-RANG COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $20,000 · OtherSA-RANG COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SOUTHER…NEW HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $20,000 · OtherNEW HOPE INTERNATIONALBUILD BRIDGE PARTNERS: $16,000 · OtherBUILD BRIDGE PARTNERSL G E S: $10,000 · OtherMISSION UKRAINE: $250,866 · ReligionMISSION UKRAINEMIJU GMP: $22,000 · ReligionMIJU GMPBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $200,000 · EducationBIOLA UNIVERSITY INCAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITYDURANNO FATHER SCHOOL USA: $16,200 · EducationDURANNO FATHER SCHOOL USA+1 more: $7,235 · EducationESCUELA SARANG: $80,000 · Youth DevelopmentESCUELA SAR…MERCY STRIDE INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 · Youth DevelopmentMERCY STRID…
Other$276,000Religion$272,866Education$243,435Youth Development$87,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMISSION UKRAINE: $250,866 over 6y, 21% of budgetBIOLA UNIVERSITY INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetESCUELA SARANG: $80,000 over 4y, 49% of budgetINTERNATIONAL EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetMIJU GMP: $22,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetAZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDURANNO FATHER SCHOOL USA: $16,200 over 1y, 13% of budgetGRACE MISSION UNIVERSITY: $7,235 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY STRIDE INTERNATIONAL: $7,000 over 1y, 15% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MISSION UKRAINE ↗
  • Who funds BIOLA UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds ESCUELA SARANG ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MIJU GMP ↗
  • Who funds AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DURANNO FATHER SCHOOL USA ↗
  • Who funds GRACE MISSION UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MERCY STRIDE INTERNATIONAL ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Life Foundation International Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Life Foundation International Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Life Foundation International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to New Life Foundation International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Life Foundation International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home