Skip to content

· Public charity

New Jersey Highlands Coalition

To protect, preserve and enhance the water, forests wildlife, farmland and other natural, historic and cultural resources of the new jersey highlands and to enhance the sustainability of natural and human communities and the quality of life for current and future generations.

$27k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$107kArts & Culture$15kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $27,130 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,130 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$609k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITIZENS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (CFSD)$5,000
PHILLIPSBURG ENVIRONMENTAL WATCH$5,000
PUDDINGSTONE COMMUNITY CLUB$5,000
WALLKILL HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%SKYLANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $5k → 4%PUDDINGSTONE COMMUNITY CLUB: $5k → 4%RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 5%WALLKILL HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%COALITION AGAINST PILGRIM PIPELINE: $1k → 7%CITIZENS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 7%MAHWAH BOE CELL TOWER: $5k → 11%POMPTON LAKES RESIDENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE MUSCONETCONG: $5k → 4%ROCKAWAY BOROUGH CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $5k → 4%WALLKILL HEADWATERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 6%RAMAPOUGH CONSERVANCY: $3k → 7%CITIZENS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (CFSD): $5k → 7%HIGHLANDS NATURE FRIENDS: $5k → 12%FRIENDS OF THE MUSCONETCONG: $5k → 4%ROCKAWAY BOROUGH CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $3k → 4%MAHWAH ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZATION: $5k → 7%PHILLIPSBURG ENVIRONMENTAL WATCH: $5k → 7%RINGWOOD CARES: $3k → 12%ALLIANCE FOR HISTORIC HAMLETS: $5k → 4%HIGHLANDS NATURE FRIENDS: $500 → 12%CITIZENS TO SAVE TEWKSBURY: $5k → 4%STOP THE QUARRY EXPANSION: $5k → 12%STOP THE QUARRY EXPANSION: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 29% of New Jersey Highlands Coalition’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in NJ; by stated purpose, 57%.

New Jersey Highlands Coalitionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$64k · 5 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
14

Total granted

$64k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+190%
+259%

Still filing today

40%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NJ
    NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION
    2× · 2021–2024 · $30k · revenue +14%
  • ST
    STOP THE QUARRY EXPANSION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR HISTORIC HAMLETS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $10k

Funded once

  • MB
    MAHWAH BOE CELL TOWER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • PL
    POMPTON LAKES RESIDENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • WT
    WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP LAND TRUST OF MORRIS COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +259%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STOP THE QUARRY EXPANSION: $10,000 · OtherSTOP THE QUARRY EXPANSIONALLIANCE FOR HISTORIC HAMLETS: $10,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR HISTORIC HAMLETSROCKAWAY BOROUGH CONSERVATION ALLIANCE: $8,000 · OtherROCKAWAY BOROUGH CONSERVATION ALLIANCEPUDDINGSTONE COMMUNITY CLUB: $5,000 · OtherPUDDINGSTONE COMMUNITY CLUBMAHWAH BOE CELL TOWER: $5,000 · OtherMAHWAH BOE CELL TOWERPOMPTON LAKES RESIDENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY: $5,000 · OtherPOMPTON LAKES RESIDENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITYIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCITIZENS TO SAVE TEWKSBURY: $5,000 · OtherCITIZENS TO SAVE TEWKSBURYTHE CANAL SOCIETY OF NJ - BOONTON TRAILS COMMITTEE: $5,000 · OtherTHE CANAL SOCIETY OF NJ - BOONTON TRAILS COMMITTEEFRIENDS OF THE MUSCONETCONG: $5,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE MUSCONETCONGRARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherRARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $2,800 · OtherRINGWOOD CARES: $2,550 · Other+2 more: $2,950 · OtherNEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION: $30,000 · EnvironmentNEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITIONWASHINGTON TOWNSHIP LAND TRUST OF MORRIS COUNTY INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentWASHINGTON TOWNSHIP LAND TRUST OF M…MAHWAH ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZATION INC: $4,750 · EnvironmentMAHWAH ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS ORG…HIGHLANDS NATURE FRIENDS INC: $5,500 · Arts & CultureSKYLANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $5,000 · Community Improvement
Other$76,300Environment$39,750Arts & Culture$5,500Community Improvement$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION: $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetHIGHLANDS NATURE FRIENDS INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON TOWNSHIP LAND TRUST OF MORRIS COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetMAHWAH ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZATION INC: $4,750 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW JERSEY HIGHLANDS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDS NATURE FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON TOWNSHIP LAND TRUST OF MORRIS COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds SKYLANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds MAHWAH ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTEERS ORGANIZATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Jersey Highlands Coalition funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Jersey Highlands Coalition. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $41k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Jersey Highlands Coalition’s filings →

    More from the funding graph