Skip to content

· Public charity

New Hampshire Higher Education Assistance Foundation

Providing scholarships for New Hampshire students of higher education.

$359k
Granted FY2020
18
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2020 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k3 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $284k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$19,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
University of New Hampshire$62,500
Keene State College$31,250
Plymouth State University$31,250
Southern New Hampshire University$31,250
Nashua Community College$19,500
Great Bay Community College$19,500
Manchester Community College$19,500
New Hampshire Technical Institute$19,500
River Valley Community College$19,500
Lakes Region Community College$17,550
Franklin Pierce University$17,500
Saint Anselm College$17,500
Rivier University$13,750
White Mountain Community College$13,650
Granite State College$12,500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%Great Bay Community College: $20k → 5%Manchester Community College: $20k → 7%Colby-Sawyer College: $1k → 7%Franklin Pierce University: $18k → 9%Lakes Region Community College: $18k → 9%University of New Hampshire: $63k → 9%River Valley Community College: $20k → 10%Dartmouth College: $5k → 10%White Mountain Community College: $14k → 13%Saint Anselm College: $18k → 7%Southern New Hampshire University: $31k → 7%Plymouth State University: $31k → 10%Nashua Community College: $20k → 7%New Hampshire Technical Institute: $20k → 7%Rivier University: $14k → 7%Granite State College: $13k → 7%New England College: $6k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of New Hampshire: $62,500 · OtherUniversity of New HampshireKeene State College: $31,250 · OtherKeene State CollegePlymouth State University: $31,250 · OtherPlymouth State UniversityNEW RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $19,500 · OtherNEW RIVER VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICESManchester Community College: $19,500 · OtherManchester Community CollegeNew Hampshire Technical Institute: $19,500 · OtherNew Hampshire Technical InstituteNashua Community College: $19,500 · OtherNashua Community CollegeCOMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE: $19,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM OF NEW HAMPSHIRELakes Region Community College: $17,550 · OtherLakes Region Community CollegeWhite Mountain Community College: $13,650 · OtherGranite State College: $12,500 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherSouthern New Hampshire University: $31,250 · EducationSouthern New Hampshire Univ…Franklin Pierce University: $17,500 · EducationFranklin Pierce UniversitySAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $17,500 · EducationSAINT ANSELM COLLEGERivier University: $13,750 · EducationRivier UniversityNew England College: $6,250 · EducationNew England College+1 more: $1,250 · Education
Other$271,200Education$87,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSouthern New Hampshire University: $31,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFranklin Pierce University: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANSELM COLLEGE: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRivier University: $13,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew England College: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetColby-Sawyer College: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southern New Hampshire University ↗
  • Who funds Franklin Pierce University ↗
  • Who funds SAINT ANSELM COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Rivier University ↗
  • Who funds New England College ↗
  • Who funds Colby-Sawyer College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Hampshire Higher Education Assistance Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Hampshire Higher Education Assistance Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record and reports $300k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Hampshire Higher Education Assistance’s filings →

    More from the funding graph