· Public charity
New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc
An entity with membership of new hampshire economic development corporations sharing resources and information on a state wide basis.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k8 grants · $201k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $57k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTHEAST ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $56,925 |
| COOS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP | $39,000 |
| BELKNAP COUNTY ECONOMIC DEV COUNCIL | $38,000 |
| MONADNOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP | $23,320 |
| MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ECONOMIC | $21,998 |
| WENTWORTH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $21,203 |
| GRAFTON REGION DEVELOPMENT CORP | $19,000 |
| ROCKINGHAM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT | $19,000 |
| COASTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP | $19,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 79% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SESTRAFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $230k · revenue +40%
- RERockingham Economic Development Corp8× · 2017–2024 · $178k · revenue +22%
- CECOOS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI8× · 2017–2024 · $172k · revenue +513%
Funded once
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To foster and develop economic vitality and prosperity consistent with the goals of the communities we serve.
Fostering, encouraging and assisting the physical location of business enterprises within the States of Vermont and New Hampshire, and having its principal purpose be industrial and economic development of one or more political…
To promote and maintain a strong business climate throughout the city and to foster a healthy and sustainable economy for the benefit of the entire community.
To serve the northern Maine region with effective regional community planning and economic development.
To promote the growth of the local economy of Scotland County and City of Laurinburg through job creation, the investment in business property and infrastructure to facilitate economic growth and job creation.
Foster Business Development in Cozad, NE
To stimulate and facilitate a vigorous regional economy, encouraging and sustaining capital investment and quality job growth.
The mission of the council is to preserve and create employment opportunities, and provide educational and business development assistance in belknap county, new hampshire.
Foster Growth in the Community
To foster, encourage and assist in the location, settlement or resettlement of industry and recreational, agricultural,and other business enterprises in the Town of Skowhegan and in the County of Somerset.
To create an entrepreneurial and innovative environment, nurturing business to launch, grow, and thrive.
The corporation was formed to lessen the burdens of government and act in the public interest; to facilitate economic activities throughout wayne county, ny including the location and expansion of civic, industrial and commercial…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grafton Regional Development Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Coos Economic Development Corporati. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STRAFFORD ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Rockingham Economic Development Corp ↗
- Who funds COOS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATI ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE ALLIANCE OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds GRAFTON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ECONOMIC COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL REGION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
- Who funds Wentworth Economic Development Corp ↗
- Who funds Coastal Economic Development Corporation ↗
- Who funds MONADNOCK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.