Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

New Hampshire · Public charity

New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc

An entity with membership of new hampshire economic development corporations sharing resources and information on a state wide basis. To develop and maintain a cooperative and working relationship among new hampshire regional economic development corporations for the purpose of promoting sustainable economic development objectives and…

$257k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
9
Grants FY2024
8
Organizations funded FY2023
0%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$21,998
Largest grant, FY2024
$56,925
Organizations funded a year
8 to 10
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$11k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 0% of the organizations New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving9$257k0%
FY20238$162k0%
FY20228$181k0%
FY20219$189k0%
FY202010$195k0%
FY201910$205k0%
FY20189$171k0%
FY201710$190kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$1.5MEmployment$67k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Strafford Economic Development Corporation$230,38185%
Rockingham Economic Development Corp$178,34582%
Coos Economic Development Corporati$172,000816%
New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc$171,000815%
Grafton Regional Development Corporation$164,46789%
Mt Washington Valley Economic Council$154,671817%
Capital Region Economic Development Corp$153,00074%
Wentworth Economic Development Corp$149,800810%
Coastal Economic Development Corporation$114,000610%
Monadnock Economic Development Corp$62,38641%

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStrafford Economic Development Corporation: $230,381 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetRockingham Economic Development Corp: $178,345 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCoos Economic Development Corporati: $172,000 over 8y, 16% of budgetNew Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc: $171,000 over 8y, 15% of budgetGrafton Regional Development Corporation: $164,467 over 8y, 8.5% of budgetMt Washington Valley Economic Council: $154,671 over 8y, 17% of budgetCapital Region Economic Development Corp: $153,000 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetWentworth Economic Development Corp: $149,800 over 8y, 10% of budgetCoastal Economic Development Corporation: $114,000 over 6y, 10% of budgetMonadnock Economic Development Corp: $62,386 over 4y, 0.7% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

New Hampshire Charita…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc with peer funders

About New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc

How much does New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc give?
New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc reported 9 grants totaling $257,446 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 8 and 10 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Community Improvement (96%), Employment (4%).
Who are New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Strafford Economic Development Corporation ($230k), Rockingham Economic Development Corp ($178k), Coos Economic Development Corporati ($172k).
Does New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include New Hampshire Charitable Foundation.
Where is New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc based?
New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations Inc is based in NH.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New Hampshire Alliance of Regional Development Corporations’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home