Skip to content
New Growth Horizon Charitable Found at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New Growth Horizon Charitable Found

New growth horizon foundation a 501(c)(3) aims to set the bar for natural wellness companies to help not only our patients, but our communities.

$220k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $162,975, the rows itemized in this filing. The $220,422 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $57,447 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,475
Median grant
4
States reached
$123k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEDAL THE CAUSE$35,000
PRIVACY RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT$20,000
ARLINGTON GREENS VETERAN'S GOLF ASS$20,000
GRASSROOTS REDEEMING LOVE$17,500
THE REPERATORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS$15,475
PINK RIBBON GOOD$15,000
OPERATION FOOD SEARCH$10,000
LAST PRISONER PROJECT$10,000
NAMI STL$10,000
STL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PEDAL THE CAUSE: $35k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$91k · 3 repeat orgs$119k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
1

Total granted

$91k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+39%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureFood & NutritionCrime & LegalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    ARLINGTON GREENS VETERANS GOLF ASSOCIATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k
  • PR
    PRIVACY RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue 0%
  • PR
    PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
2
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
3
St Louis Mediation Project Inc

The corporation exists to provide pro bono (free) mediation and other dispute resolution services to communities in need, and any other charitable purpose allowed under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended.

Crime & Legal
4
St Louis Integrated Health Network

The st. louis integrated health network, through partnership and collaboration, is a healthcare intermediary building capacity across sectors to improve wellbeing by increasing access to health and social services.

Health
5
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
6
Pro Publica Inc

Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

Arts & Culture
7
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
8
Illinois Prison Project

Through advocacy, public education, and direct representation of thousands of needlessly incarcerated people, we bring hope to and fight in community with incarcerated people and their loved ones for a brighter, more humane, more just…

—
9
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
10
Legal Accountability Project

The Legal Accountability Projects mission is to ensure that law clerks have positive clerkship experiences, while extending support and resources to those who do not.

Crime & Legal
11
Bjc Health System Group Return

The 24 licensed hospitals and service organizations of bjc healthcare serve the healthcare needs of the residents of metropolitan st. louis and kansas city, mid-missouri, eastern kansas and southern illinois. based in urban, suburban, and…

Health
12
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Children's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pedal the Cause. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARLINGTON GREENS VETERANS GOLF ASSOCIATION: $35,000 · OtherARLINGTON GREENS VETERANS GOLF ASSOCIATIONPRIVACY RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT: $31,035 · OtherPRIVACY RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECTGRASSROOTS REDEEMING LOVE: $17,500 · OtherGRASSROOTS REDEEMING LOVEPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $25,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INCNAMI St Louis: $10,000 · HealthNAMI St LouisST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSP…PEDAL THE CAUSE: $35,000 · Human ServicesPEDAL THE CAUSETHE REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS: $15,475 · Arts & CultureVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10,663 · Public BenefitOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionLAST PRISONER PROJECT: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$83,535Health$45,000Human Services$35,000Arts & Culture$15,475Public Benefit$10,663Food & Nutrition$10,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEDAL THE CAUSE: $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPRIVACY RIGHTS EDUCATION PROJECT: $31,035 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE REPERTORY THEATRE OF ST LOUIS: $15,475 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $10,663 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI St Louis: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Growth Horizon Charitable Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Growth Horizon Charitable Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Growth Horizon Charitable Found’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home