· Public charity
New Bethel Community Development Corporation
The mission of the new bethel cdc is to improve the quality of life for ourselves, our families, and our neighbors by working together on projects and issues that will maintain and/or create affordable housing, fulfill transportation needs, provide rapid response disaster relief and support economic opportunities for businesses and…
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $254k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $123k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MISSISSIPPI RISING COALITION | $123,336 |
| PROGRAM BELIEVE | $46,500 |
| MISSISSIPPI EDUCATION ORGANIZING ASSOCIATION | $38,204 |
| TUPELO MUTUAL AIDE PROJECT | $29,550 |
| NEW BETHEL MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH | $24,000 |
| ONE VOICE | $18,500 |
| MISSISSIPPI MOTIV ORG FOR VOTER EMPOWERMENT | $16,800 |
| HIJRA HOUSE ASSOCIATION | $16,800 |
| IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE | $14,000 |
| CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| MISSISSIPPI FARM TO SCHOOL NETWORK | $10,000 |
| MISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR CULTURAL PRODUCTION | $10,000 |
| DESOTA MUTUAL AID | $10,000 |
| ADOS EMPOWERMENT | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fishing community advocacy
Mira works to support immigrants in the free and equitable use of their rights in mississippi through public education organizing and advocacy
The mission of the Southern Black Policy and Advocacy Network is to improve health outcomes and to reduce social and economic disparities impacting Black communities living in the U.S. South.
Our mission is to promote health and wellness in the Deep South through Prevention, Intervention, Education, & Research.
Our mission is to revitalize and re-engage the community by reconnecting to the Earth through land stewardship, food sovereignty, sustainability, and herbalism.
Arkansas Appleseed Justice Center is an advocacy organization launched in September 2021 to advance inclusive, collective, and systemic solutions to issues of equity, poverty, and justice facing Arkansans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Rising Coalition and the most unlike its peers is Petal Healing Garden. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Bethel Community Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.