Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nevada Education Fund for Planned Parenthood Affiliates

Nevada education for planned parenthood affiliates is the education arm for the planned parenthood afiliiates in nevada, providing education awards for those pursuing fields and research in the areas of womens reproductive health.

$207k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Civil Rights$1.1MCommunity Improvement$171kEmployment$45kPhilanthropy$30kHealth$17kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$200,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$59k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED$200,000
PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE NV$7,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE: $17k → 8%TIDES FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%NEO PHILANTHROPY: $10k → 17%BENENSON STRATEGY GROUP: $20k → 12%NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED: $310k → 10%PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE NV: $10k → 13%NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED: $300k → 10%PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE NV: $7k → 13%NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED: $212k → 10%NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED: $200k → 10%NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED: $13k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED — $1,034,134 · OtherNEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNEDCOMMUNITY OUTREACH GROUP — $171,261 · OtherCOMMUNITY OUTREACH GROUPMAKE IT WORK NV — $45,000 · Other+5 more — $67,800 · OtherTIDES FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $17,000 · HealthNEO Philanthropy Inc — $10,000 · Public BenefitTU CASA LATINA — $8,000 · Human Services
Other$1,318,195Philanthropy$20,000Health$17,000Public Benefit$10,000Human Services$8,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTU CASA LATINA — $8,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc
  • Who funds TU CASA LATINA

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nevada Education Fund for Planned Parenthood Affiliates funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph