Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Neta Foundation

Distributing charitable funds to and making impactful investments that further human prospering and well-being, primarily (but not exclusively) focusing on scientific research efforts and early-stage technologies

$752k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $638,250 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $751,936 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $113,686 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $530k
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$7.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE$200,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$145,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK TRUSTEES OF$108,000
POLLYLABS FOUNDATION$77,250
IGARAPE INC$40,000
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$30,000
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS BEIT HALOCHEM USA$10,000
TEMPLE ISRAEL OF THE CITY OF NY$10,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY$8,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $30k → 8%CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL: $145k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY: $8k → 17%POLLYLABS FOUNDATION: $77k → 20%IGARAPE INC: $40k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10k → 17%TEMPLE ISRAEL OF THE CITY OF NY: $10k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK TRUSTEES OF: $108k → 17%AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE: $200k → 17%FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS BEIT HALOCHEM USA: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $105k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

South America$105k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: OPERATIONAL GRANTS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
2
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
3
American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International
4
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

5
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
6
American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education
7
Friends of Jerusalem College of Technology Ltd

The organization supports the jerusalem college of technology in israel which provides degree programs to students of all denominations in israel.

Education
8
Tamid Israel Investment Group Ltd

Tamid group facilitates experiential education and cultivates relationships to create a strong, lasting connection to israel for emerging professionals.

Youth Development
9
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
American Friends of Israel College of Technology for Women

To promote and assist the israel college of technology for women, dba "medreshet moriah", in jerusalem, israel.

International
12
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Committee for the Weizmann Institute of Science Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pollylabs Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
2/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $200,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INCCentral Fund of Israel — $145,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of IsraelIGARAPE INC — $40,000 · InternationalIGARAPE INC+2 more — $18,000 · InternationalTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $108,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA…Massachusetts Institute of Technology — $30,000 · EducationMassachusetts Institute …POLLYLABS FOUNDATION — $77,250 · Community ImprovementPOLLYLABS FOU…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $10,000 · Civil RightsTEMPLE ISRAEL OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $10,000 · Other
International$403,000Education$138,000Community Improvement$77,250Civil Rights$10,000Other$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $145,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $108,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLLYLABS FOUNDATION — $77,250 over 1y, 16% of budgetIGARAPE INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Neta Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 35%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Neta Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Neta Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph