Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nerliquilici Charitable Foundation Tr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$99kHealth$65kAnimals$58kEnvironment$55kFood & Nutrition$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$31kHousing & Shelter$18kEducation$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
$6,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$620k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD BANK OF EL DORADO COUNTY$11,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS RESEARCH$10,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$10,000
WOUNDED WARRIORS$6,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$6,000
FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA$5,983
ANIMAL OUTREACH OF THE MOTHER LODE$5,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY EL DORADO COUNTY$2,000
GRIGSBY FAMILY FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $6k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $6k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 8%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS OF AMERICA: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IA
CA
CO
VA
KS
TN
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Nerliquilici Charitable Foundation Tr’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Nerliquilici Charitable Foundation Trlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$339k · 11 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against -25% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
4

Total granted

$339k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-25%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $65k · revenue +125%
  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +62%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    2× · 2018–2019 · $31k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • HF
    Hope For The Warriors
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -25%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF EL DORADO HILLS
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Veterinarians Without Borders Usa

Our mission is to strengthen animal health and welfare to build more resilient communities. we do this by enhancing veterinary care, bolstering community disaster response and recovery, championing sustainable livelihoods, and improving…

International
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

4
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
5
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
6
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
7
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
8
The Peregrine Fund Inc

To change the future for nature and humanity by conserving birds of prey worldwide.

9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
11
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
12
CJ3 Foundation

Cj3 foundation provides services, support, and advocacy to united states military service members, veterans/disabled veterans, law enforcement, and emergency responders who need/require assistance, and then connecting them with resources…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Grigsby Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION — $53,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $28,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSEFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY EL DORADO COUNTY — $11,078 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY EL DORADO CO…WOUNDED WARRIORS — $11,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIORSRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF EL DORADO HILLS — $5,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS — $4,110 · OtherAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,842 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red …FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $26,983 · Human ServicesFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS I…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJEC…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $65,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S…WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $55,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE …Food Bank of El Dorado County — $32,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank…ANIMAL OUTREACH OF THE MOTHER LODE — $31,030 · AnimalsGRIGSBY FAMILY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · PhilanthropyHope For The Warriors — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$122,188Human Services$77,825Health$65,000Environment$55,000Food & Nutrition$32,000Animals$31,030Philanthropy$11,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $65,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of El Dorado County — $32,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL OUTREACH OF THE MOTHER LODE — $31,030 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $30,842 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC — $26,983 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRIGSBY FAMILY FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHope For The Warriors — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds Food Bank of El Dorado County
  • Who funds ANIMAL OUTREACH OF THE MOTHER LODE
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds GRIGSBY FAMILY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Hope For The Warriors

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nerliquilici Charitable Foundation Tr funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph