Skip to content
Neodesha Community Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Neodesha Community Foundation

THE FOUNDATION'S MISSION IS TO ASSIST WITH THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNITY OF NEODESHA, KANSAS.

$308k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$81k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0163% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$273kEducation$223kHousing & Shelter$117kYouth Development$48kHuman Services$20kFood & Nutrition$19kPhilanthropy$7kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $140k
$5,758
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WA RANKIN MEMORIAL LIBRARY$80,540
CARVER KANSAS PROPERTY LLC$59,454
Individual grant recipient$33,195
Individual grant recipient$30,864
HIGHWAY MAN SIGNS LLC$18,571
FALCON ROOFING LLC$11,172
Individual grant recipient$8,820
Individual grant recipient$7,705
RECRETE DESIGN LLC$6,755
Individual grant recipient$6,641
Individual grant recipient$6,439
Individual grant recipient$6,125
JM ENTERPRISE LLC$5,758
WILSON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$4,854
REYNOLDS PLUMBING HEATING AND ELEC$4,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WILLIAM MARK JORDAN: $8k → 9%HIGHWAY MAN SIGNS LLC: $19k → 14%KOEHN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: $106k → 14%FALCON ROOFING LLC: $11k → 15%O-AUTO WASH LLC: $20k → 15%GRIFFITH DEVELOPMENT LLC: $30k → 13%USD 461 NEODESHA KS: $142k → 14%RBC CONCRETE: $6k → 15%WA RANKIN MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $81k → 14%WILLIAM BROWERS: $2k → 15%BILLYS BAR & GRILL: $71k → 14%CORNERSTONE REGIONAL SURVEYING LLC: $2k → 15%CITY OF NEODESHA: $64k → 14%CHRIS JABBEN: $62k → 14%CARVER KANSAS PROPERTY LLC: $59k → 14%DEPEW LAW FIRM: $55k → 14%MIKE PORTER RENTAL: $43k → 14%CITY OF NEODESHA: $34k → 14%DEPEW LAW FIRM: $33k → 14%RYAN KEITH MILLER: $31k → 14%LIONS CLUB: $28k → 14%PIN ACTION LANES: $23k → 14%BLESSED BLOSSOMS: $18k → 14%CITY OF NEODESHA: $17k → 14%PIZZA HUT: $15k → 14%THE DERRICK: $15k → 14%CITY OF NEODESHA - TLC: $15k → 14%SONDER SALON: $14k → 14%CITY OF NEODESHA - TLC: $14k → 14%EDWARD DUENSING: $12k → 14%FOOD PANTRY: $11k → 14%MOSSY OAK: $10k → 14%BRIAN COUNSIL: $9k → 14%CITY OF NEODESHA - TLC: $8k → 14%CITY OF NEODESHA: $8k → 14%JM ENTERPRISE LLC: $8k → 14%CITY OF NEODESHA: $7k → 14%WMC FOUNDATION: $7k → 14%RECRETE DESIGN LLC: $7k → 14%SOUTHEAST AUCTIONS: $7k → 14%G & W FOODS GRANT: $7k → 14%SONDER SALON: $7k → 14%EDWARD THEODORE DUENSING: $6k → 14%JM ENTERPRISE LLC: $6k → 14%WILSON MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%REYNOLDS PLUMBING HEATING AND ELEC: $5k → 14%NEODESHA CROSSROADS CHURCH: $5k → 14%JIM HEAD: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$354k · 6 repeat orgs$896k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
18

Total granted

$354k
$628k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $268k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2019–2025 · $131k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2025 · $88k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2017–2023 · $59k

Funded once

  • U4
    USD 461 NEODESHA KS
    one grant, 2024 · $142k
  • KC
    KOEHN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $106k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $71k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USD 461 NEODESHA KS: $142,480 · OtherUSD 461 NEODESHA KSIndividual grant recipient: $130,898 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKOEHN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: $105,848 · OtherKOEHN CONSTRUCTION SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $88,117 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWA RANKIN MEMORIAL LIBRARY: $80,540 · OtherWA RANKIN MEMORIAL LIBRARYIndividual grant recipient: $71,173 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $62,478 · OtherCARVER KANSAS PROPERTY LLC: $59,454 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $58,534 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $42,854 · OtherLIONS CLUB: $42,223 · Other+34 more: $361,108 · Other+34 moreWilson Medical Center Foundation: $4,854 · Philanthropy
Other$1,245,707Philanthropy$4,854

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Wilson Medical Center Foundation ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neodesha Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neodesha Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neodesha’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home