Skip to content

· Private foundation

NEMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC co LANDMARK FIDUCIARY MGMT LLC

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$62k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

International$121kHuman Services$68kPhilanthropy$48kReligion$10kHealth$10k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
$3,626
Median grant
2
States reached
$158k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BELEV ECHAD INC$30,000
COMUNIDADE ISRAELITA DO PORTO$25,000
CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GRENADA INC$3,626
FRIENDS OF ELNET$1,800
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC$1,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 79% of grant dollars ($204k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 21% that went abroad ($53k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHESED OF FLATBUSH SERVICES INC: $20k → 20%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2k → 14%BELEV ECHAD INC: $30k → 17%BELEV ECHAD INC: $16k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 21% of all-years giving ($53k)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$26k · 1 grant
Portugal$25k · 1 grant
United Kingdom$2k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
5
Friends of United Hatzalah Inc

Friends of united hatzalah, inc .(fouh) raises and provides funding to not-for-profit organizations that provide medical and trauma-related first responder services in israel and around the world. fouh focuses the majority of its support…

Arts & Culture
6
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
The Jerusalem Connection
—
9
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
10
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
12
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of Ir David Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chesed of Flatbush Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIOLA GROUP OPERATION LTD: $26,000 · OtherVIOLA GROUP OPERATION LTDWOMENS INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORG: $26,000 · OtherWOMENS INTERNATIONAL ZIONIST ORGCOMUNIDADE ISRAELITA DO PORTO: $25,000 · OtherCOMUNIDADE ISRAELITA DO PORTOAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL NAVY SEA: $16,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL NAVY SEACHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GRENADA INC: $8,026 · OtherCHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GRENADA INCBARTHOLOMEW LAWSON FNDTN FOR CHILDR: $8,000 · OtherBARTHOLOMEW LAWSON FNDTN FOR CHILDR+1 more: $2,002 · OtherBELEV ECHAD INC: $46,000 · Human ServicesBELEV ECHAD INCCHESED OF FLATBUSH SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHESED OF FLATBUSH SERVICES I…+1 more: $1,800 · Human ServicesMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMP…UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $18,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDE…Jewish Orthodox Womens Medical Association Inc: $10,000 · PhilanthropyJewish Orthodox Womens Me…IRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH F…FRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC: $18,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF ELNET: $1,800 · International
Other$111,028Human Services$67,800Philanthropy$58,000International$19,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBELEV ECHAD INC: $46,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESED OF FLATBUSH SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetFRIENDS OF IR DAVID INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Orthodox Womens Medical Association Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetIRANIAN AMERICAN JEWISH FEDERATION OF NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ELNET: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization NEMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC co LANDMARK FIDUCIARY MGMT LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from NEMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC co LANDMARK FIDUCIARY MGMT LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to NEMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC co LANDMARK FIDUCIARY MGMT LLC?

Find your warmest path to NEMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC co LANDMARK FIDUCIARY MGMT LLC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on NEMA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC co LANDMARK FIDUCIARY MGMT LLC’s filings →

More from the funding graph