Skip to content
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants: funding profile →

Utah · Public charity

Nebo Education Foundation

Support programs and activities which enhance quality of education and assure that all students of nebo school district have access to quality education.

$257k
Granted FY2020
1
Grants FY2020
1
Organizations funded FY2020
0%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$257,466
Largest grant, FY2020
$257,466
Organizations funded a year
1 to 1
FY2019 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
1
Total assets, FY2020
$694k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 0% of the organizations Nebo Education Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20201$257k0%
FY20191$277kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2020.

Education$534k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Nebo School District$534,3572n/a

Compare Nebo Education Foundation with peer funders

About Nebo Education Foundation

How much does Nebo Education Foundation give?
Nebo Education Foundation reported 1 grants totaling $257,466 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 1 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2020.
What does Nebo Education Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2020, its largest causes are Education (100%).
Who are Nebo Education Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2020: Nebo School District ($534k).
Does Nebo Education Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Where is Nebo Education Foundation based?
Nebo Education Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 1 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $607k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2020, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nebo Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home