Skip to content
Ncpdp Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Ncpdp Foundation

Support programs, projects and people that drive quality healthcare through the use of standards-based hit to improve outcomes.

$789k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$789k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.5MEducation$340kScience & Tech$75kPhilanthropy$10kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$789,371
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIGITAL THERAPEUTICS$789,371
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 38% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARX PRODUCTIONS INC: $6k → 11%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%QUANDRY PEAK RESEARCH: $50k → 14%UAMS FOUNDATION FUND: $10k → 17%HEALTHCARE READY: $25k → 14%RX LIVE: $65k → 12%Point of Care Partners: $192k → 13%UF COLLEGE OF PHARMACY: $10k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: $10k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $30k → 14%UNIVERITY OF WISCONSIN: $36k → 10%UNIV OF TN HEALTH SCIENCE: $25k → 14%BUTLER UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%MIDWESTERN UNV CHICAGO COLLEGE PHAR: $10k → 7%DIGITAL THERAPEUTICS: $789k → 7%NCPA INNOVATION CENTER: $25k → 9%SDSU FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $50k → 19%STC HEALTH: $100k → 11%QUANDRY PEAK RESEARCH: $25k → 14%POINT OF CARE PARTNERS: $102k → 13%WISCONSIN PHARMACY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%DIGITAL THERAPEUTICS: $68k → 7%JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $42k → 19%STC HEALTH: $50k → 11%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $26k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
SD
IA
IN
PA
CA
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 8 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
14

Total granted

$1.7M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+20%

Still filing today

25%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    DIGITAL THERAPEUTICS ALLIANCE INCORPORATED
    2× · 2023–2024 · $857k · revenue -79% · 69% of their budget
  • PO
    Point of Care Partners
    2× · 2021–2022 · $294k
  • SH
    STC HEALTH
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k

Funded once

  • R
    RXLIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $65k
  • JH
    JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $42k
  • UO
    UNIV OF TN HEALTH SCIENCE
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
7
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
9
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
12
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ncpa Innovation Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIGITAL THERAPEUTICS ALLIANCE INCORPORATED: $856,871 · OtherDIGITAL THERAPEUTICS ALLIANCE INCORPORATEDPoint of Care Partners: $294,476 · OtherPoint of Care PartnersSTC HEALTH: $150,000 · OtherSTC HEALTHUniversity of Wisconsin Madison: $102,042 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonQUANDRY PEAK RESEARCH: $75,000 · OtherRXLIVE: $65,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $60,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $60,000 · Other+3 more: $72,871 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $76,092 · EducationJOHNS HOPKI…WISCONSIN PHARMACY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationWISCONSIN P…UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …Butler University: $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationMidwestern University: $10,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $10,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationNCPA INNOVATION CENTER: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,736,260Education$196,092Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIGITAL THERAPEUTICS ALLIANCE INCORPORATED: $856,871 over 2y, 69% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $76,092 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNCPA INNOVATION CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetButler University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMidwestern University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ncpdp Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ncpdp Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ncpdp’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home