Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Public charity

National Vote at Home Institute

To educate citizens of the United States on the benefits of Vote at Home policies.

$27k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
Organizations funded FY2021
0%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2021
$27,181
Largest grant, FY2021
$27,181
Organizations funded a year
1 to 13
FY2020 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Total assets, FY2021
$69k

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 0% of the organizations National Vote at Home Institute funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20211$27k0%
FY202013$998kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2021.

Public Benefit$801kScience & Tech$200kEducation$15kArts & Culture$9k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
OH
NJ
MO
KY
TN
DC
AL
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2021, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Citizen$200,0001n/a
Commonwealth of Kentucky$200,0001n/a
Cuyahoga County Office of Early Childhood$69,9201n/a
Georgia Office of the Secretary of State$62,2852n/a
Civic Tn$20,00013%
City of Battle Creek$16,1121n/a
Friends of West-End$15,0001n/a
Show Me Integrity$12,450113%
Plum Media$9,1501n/a
Buena Vista Charter Township$7,6201n/a

Plus 3 recipients with no EIN on record ($413k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Center for Technology and Civic LifeIL13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Technology and Civic Life

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare National Vote at Home Institute with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Vote at Home Institute?

Find your warmest path to National Vote at Home Institute through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About National Vote at Home Institute

How much does National Vote at Home Institute give?
National Vote at Home Institute reported 1 grants totaling $27,181 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 13 organizations a year over FY2020 to FY2021.
What does National Vote at Home Institute fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2021, its largest causes are Public Benefit (78%), Science & Tech (20%), Education (1%).
Who are National Vote at Home Institute's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2021: Citizen ($200k), Commonwealth of Kentucky ($200k), Cuyahoga County Office of Early Childhood ($70k).
Does National Vote at Home Institute fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as National Vote at Home Institute?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Center for Technology and Civic Life.
Where is National Vote at Home Institute based?
National Vote at Home Institute is based in DC.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Vote at Home Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph