Skip to content

· Public charity

National Pancreas Foundation

The NATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION provides hope for those suffering from pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer through funding cutting edge research, advocating for new and better therapies, and providing support and education for patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals.

$94k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.0MEducation$85k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $85,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $94,146 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,146 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$499k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$35,000
JOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY CO BANK OF AMERICA$25,000
CINNCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA: $50k → 11%PLATFORMQ HEALTH EDUCATION: $68k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $18k → 11%THE REGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $25k → 10%THE REGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: $25k → 10%CITY OF HOPE: $25k → 14%WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $25k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $50k → 16%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $25k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%AMERICAN PANCREATIC ASSOCIATION: $2k → 5%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS: $34k → 11%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 15%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 16%THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO: $50k → 14%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY: $50k → 8%GLOBAL IMPACT: $68k → 9%CME OUTFITTERS LLC: $6k → 8%MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA: $25k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $18k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $50k → 16%AMERICAN PANCREATIC ASSOCIATION: $62k → 15%OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 15%CINNCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $25k → 16%CURES WITHIN REACH: $39k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER: $110k → 11%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $50k → 16%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 15%CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $25k → 16%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $25k → 16%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $25k → 16%CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of National Pancreas Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

National Pancreas Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$729k · 8 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
24

Total granted

$729k
$997k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+59%

Still filing today

63%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24’25
EducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    5× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +53%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +45%
  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    2× · 2017–2023 · $75k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • PH
    PLATFORMQ HEALTH EDUCATION
    one grant, 2019 · $68k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
3
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
10
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgetown University; the most unlike its peers is Global Impact. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
20/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $125,000 · OtherTHE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITYUTMD ANDERSON: $100,000 · OtherUTMD ANDERSONTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANMAYO CLINIC: $75,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICPLATFORMQ HEALTH EDUCATION: $67,500 · OtherPLATFORMQ HEALTH EDUCATIONAMERICAN PENCREATIC ASSOCIATION INC: $64,000 · OtherAMERICAN PENCREATIC ASSOCIATION INCUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTON: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER HOUSTONThe Hospital for Sick Childre: $50,000 · OtherThe Hospital for Sick Childre+7 more: $155,775 · Other+7 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $210,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STAN…Baylor College of Medicine: $75,000 · EducationBaylor College of MedicineUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $70,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUND…GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $50,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State Un…University of Chicago: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN T…University of Miami: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $34,463 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $120,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITA…H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · HealthH LEE MOFFITT CANC…Children's Hospital Corporation: $50,000 · HealthChildren's Hospita…MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KET…THE CURE STARTS NOW INC: $39,270 · HealthTHE CURE STARTS NO…CITY OF HOPE: $25,000 · HealthCITY OF HOPEGlobal Impact: $67,537 · International
Other$937,275Education$739,463Health$334,270International$67,537

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $210,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Impact: $67,537 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN PENCREATIC ASSOCIATION INC: $64,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CURE STARTS NOW INC: $39,270 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Pancreas Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Pancreas Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Pancreas’ filings →

More from the funding graph