Skip to content

· Public charity

National Organization for Women Foundation Inc

To finance & conduct charitable and educational programs in support of the national organization for women, inc.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$527kPublic Benefit$222kArts & Culture$49kEducation$41kCrime & Legal$10k
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $149,903, the rows itemized in this filing. The $160,354 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,451 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $110k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ERA NOW INC$30,000
MY OWN EDUCATION FUND$10,000
AUSTIN NOW$10,000
NORTHEAST INDIANA NOW$10,000
FLORIDA NOW$10,000
NORTHWEST INDIANA NOW$10,000
GEORGIA NOW$10,000
WOMEN'S MARCH NETWORK$10,000
TEXAS NOW EDUCATION FUND$10,000
MONROE COUNTY INDIANA NOW$8,841
CHAPEL HILL NOW$8,106
PENNSYLVANIA NOW$8,000
RIVERSIDE COUNTY NOW$7,500
MCHENRY COUNTY NOW$7,456
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PENNSYLVANIA NOW: $8k → 7%PENNSYLVANIA NOW: $12k → 22%RIVERSIDE COUNTY NOW: $15k → 11%WOMENS JUSTICE NOW: $10k → 17%WOMEN'S MARCH NETWORK: $200k → 20%AUSTIN NOW: $10k → 10%VOTE FOR EQUALITY: $287k → 14%JACKSONVILLE NOW: $7k → 14%CHAPEL HILL NOW: $8k → 13%OHIO NOW: $10k → 15%WEST VIRGINIA NOW: $10k → 16%MCHENRY COUNTY NOW: $7k → 6%VIRGINIA NOW: $6k → 7%RIVERSIDE COUNTY NOW: $8k → 11%ERA NOW INC: $30k → 17%WOMEN'S MARCH INC: $10k → 20%WOMEN'S MARCH NETWORK: $10k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
IN
OH
PA
CA
WV
VA
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$420k · 9 repeat orgs$428k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$420k
$362k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+69%

Still filing today

0%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WM
    Womens March Network
    2× · 2022–2024 · $210k
  • TN
    TEXAS NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN EDUCATION FUND
    3× · 2022–2024 · $51k
  • MC
    MONROE COUNTY NOW
    3× · 2022–2024 · $34k

Funded once

  • VF
    VOTE FOR EQUALITY
    one grant, 2020 · $287k
  • NO
    NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA NOW
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOTE FOR EQUALITY: $286,700 · OtherVOTE FOR EQUALITYWomens March Network: $210,000 · OtherWomens March NetworkTEXAS NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN EDUCATION FUND: $50,988 · OtherTEXAS NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN EDUCATION FUNDMONROE COUNTY NOW: $33,818 · OtherERA NOW INC: $30,000 · Other+18 more: $236,430 · Other+18 more
Other$847,936

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Womens March Network ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS JUSTICE NOW ↗
  • Who funds Womens March Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Organization for Women Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Organization for Women Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Organization for Women’s filings →

    More from the funding graph