Skip to content

· Public charity

National Lawyers Guild Inc

Unites lawyers and other related parties in an organization which functions as an effective political and social force in the service of the people

$156k
Granted FY2022
4
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Crime & Legal$231k
02FY2022 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$49,387
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- SAN FRANCISCO CHAPTER$60,372
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MILWAUKEE CHAPTER$49,387
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MINNESOTA CHAPTER$37,009
NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- COLORADO CHAPTER$7,750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MINNESOTA CHAPTER: $37k → 11%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- SAN FRANCISCO CHAPTER: $60k → 10%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MILWAUKEE CHAPTER: $49k → 17%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- PORTLAND CHAPTER: $10k → 12%NETWORK FOR STRONG COMMUNITIES INC: $30k → 14%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- COLORADO CHAPTER: $8k → 12%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- CHICAGO CHAPTER: $10k → 14%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- SAN FRANCISCO CHAPTER: $10k → 10%NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MILWAUKEE CHAPTER: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
OR
CA
CO
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
2/2
Grantees still filing
0/2
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

National Lawyers Guild - SFBA Chapter: $70,372 · OtherNational Lawyers Guild - SFBA ChapterNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MILWAUKEE CHAPTER: $49,387 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MILWAUKEE CHAPTERNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD - MINNESOTA CHAPTER: $37,009 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD - MINNESOTA CHAPTERNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- PORTLAND CHAPTER: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- CHICAGO CHAPTER: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- DETROIT & MICHIGAN CHAPTER: $10,000 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- COLORADO CHAPTER: $7,750 · OtherNATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD- MILWAUKEE CHAPTER: $6,840 · OtherNetwork For Strong Communities Inc: $30,000 · Crime & LegalNetwork For St…
Other$201,358Crime & Legal$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Lawyers Guild - SFBA Chapter: $70,372 over 2y, 11% of budgetNetwork For Strong Communities Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Lawyers Guild - SFBA Chapter ↗
  • Who funds Network For Strong Communities Inc ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Lawyers Guild Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Lawyers Guild Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Lawyers Guild’s filings →

    More from the funding graph