Skip to content
National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc

To enable the access and choice of america's seniors in their housing and care by providing data, analytics and connections that bring together investors and providers in the sector.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$318kHealth$174kSocial Science$100kCommunity Improvement$39kHuman Services$28k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILKEN INSTITUTE$50,000
WSU FOUNDATION$20,000
VISION CENTER$10,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
REAL ESTATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Age Friendly Foundation: $8k → 8%Vision Centre: $10k → 12%VISION CENTER: $10k → 13%VISION CENTER: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
CT
CA
VA
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$483k · 5 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
3

Total granted

$483k
$133k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+109%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MILKEN INSTITUTE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $270k · revenue +549%
  • WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +42%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $67k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +109%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +63%
  • TA
    THE AGE FRIENDLY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +728%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
3
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
4
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
5
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
6
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
7
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
8
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
9
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
10
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

—
12
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vision Centre-Leadership Development for Aging Services; the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $270,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTEWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 · EducationWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSI…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $42,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CA…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FO…PROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · InternationalPROJECT HOPE - TH…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $66,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…REAL ESTATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $39,000 · Community ImprovementVISION CENTRE-LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR AGING SERVICES: $27,500 · Human ServicesTHE AGE FRIENDLY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$270,000Education$147,500International$100,000Health$66,500Community Improvement$39,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $270,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOPE - THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $66,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $42,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREAL ESTATE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $39,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetVISION CENTRE-LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOR AGING SERVICES: $27,500 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE AGE FRIENDLY FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 22% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Investment Center for Seniors Housing & Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home