Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Institute of Metal Working Skills Inc

Development and promulgation of precision manufacturing skill standards, certifies individual skills against standards, accredits programs that meet quality requirements.

$524k
Granted FY2018
2
Grants FY2018
States reached
$270k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 100% of NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR METALWORKING SKILLS INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2018 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $280,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $524,335 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $244,335 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $250k+1 grant · $270k
$270,000
Median grant
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IMMERSIVE ENGINEERING INC$270,000
WORKSHOP FOR WARRIORS$10,000
02Your field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2018.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172018, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

IMMERSIVE ENGINEERING INC — $270,000 · OtherIMMERSIVE ENGINEERING INCIndividual grant recipient — $91,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMANUFACTURING RENAISSANCE — $50,000 · OtherMANUFACTURING RENAISSANCECOORSTEK — $50,000 · OtherCOORSTEKIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOWLING GREEN METALFORMING LLC — $30,000 · Other+15 more — $201,965 · Other+15 more
Other$793,465

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph