Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Housing and Community Development Law Project

The Organization is a national housing and legal advocacy center.

$679k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$141k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20232025.

Civil Rights$255kHealth$150kEducation$141kPhilanthropy$120kArts & Culture$107kCommunity Improvement$85kCrime & Legal$15k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$120,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The Trustees of Princeton$141,000
A Better Way Foundation$120,000
Tides Foundation$120,000
Root Cause Research Ctr$107,382
KC Tenants$105,000
Southside Together$85,165
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Leadership Counsel on Justice: $150k → 12%KC Tenants: $105k → 15%National Organization of Sist: $15k → 11%A Better Way Foundation: $120k → 12%National Alliance to End: $15k → 11%Southside Together: $85k → 14%The Trustees of Princeton: $141k → 11%Root Cause Research Ctr: $107k → 15%National Organization of Sist: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Asian Americans Leading Together

South Asian Americans Leading Together is a national movement strategy and advocacy organization committed to racial justice through structural change.

2
Strategic Concepts in Organizing & Policy Education

To Build grassroots power to eliminate structural barriers to social and economic opportunities in low-income and disenfranchised communities.

Human Services
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
Tenants and Workers United

Tenants and workers united is a democratically controlled, grassroots organization committed to winning social and economic justice for all people in northern virginia-latinos, african americans, tenants, immigrants, workers, youth and low…

Arts & Culture
5
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
6
Eastlake Tenants Union

The East Lake Tenants Union (ELTU) is a nonprofit organization focused on grassroots organizing to empower low-income tenants in Chicago, particularly in predominantly Black and BIPOC communities. Our main activities include tenant…

Human Services
7
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
8
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
9
Tenants Together

As California's only statewide renters' rights organization, Tenants Together works to improve the lives of California's tenants through capacity-building, movement-building, and statewide advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
10
Communities Resist Inc

We join our clients in the struggle to organize, assert their rights and protect their homes. we work to ensure that community voices are centered in the decisions that impact their lives and neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
11
Sustain Equity Group

Promote violence prevention leadership, development and networking opportunities for Black women and girls.

Community Improvement
12
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Alliance to End Sexual Violence and the most unlike its peers is Root Cause Research Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY — $150,000 · Civil RightsLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AN…KC TENANTS — $105,000 · Civil RightsKC TENANTSA BETTER WAY FOUNDATION ABWF INC — $120,000 · HealthA BETTER WAY FOUNDA…NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT — $30,000 · HealthNATIONAL ORGANIZATI…The Trustees of Princeton University — $141,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Pr…TIDES FOUNDATION — $120,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIO…ROOT CAUSE RESEARCH CENTER INC — $107,382 · Arts & CultureROOT CAUSE RE…Southside Together Organizing For Power — $85,165 · Community ImprovementSouthside T…NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $15,000 · Crime & Legal
Civil Rights$255,000Health$150,000Education$141,000Philanthropy$120,000Arts & Culture$107,382Community Improvement$85,165Crime & Legal$15,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY — $150,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $141,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOT CAUSE RESEARCH CENTER INC — $107,382 over 1y, 33% of budgetSouthside Together Organizing For Power — $85,165 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF SISTERS OF COLOR ENDING SEXUAL ASSAULT — $30,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END SEXUAL VIOLENCE — $15,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Housing and Community Development Law Project funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 100%
  • National Organization of Sisters of Color Ending Sexual Assault100% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph