Skip to content

· Public charity

National Fish Habitat Fund Inc

To provide funding for on-the-ground conservation activities that support the protection and restoration of fish habitat through diverse partnerships across the United States.

$489k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$263k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Environment$1.2MRecreation & Sports$236kHousing & Shelter$231kArts & Culture$30kYouth Development$10k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $94k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $133k
  • $250k+1 grant · $263k
$26,020
Median grant
5
States reached
$912k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Iowa Dept of Natural Resourse$262,831
Northcentral Pennsylvania Con$75,000
Arkansas Fish & Game Fnd$57,500
Missouri Dept of Conservation$26,020
Individual grant recipient$22,500
Reef Ball Foundation$19,996
Friends of Lake Ouachita$15,000
Georgia BASS Nation Youth Inc$10,044
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 50% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 13%Berks County Conservation: $119k → 11%Northcentral Pennsylvania Con: $75k → 12%Crawford Cnty Conservation: $23k → 14%Upper Trinity Regional Water: $160k → 8%Texas Parks & Wildlife: $90k → 10%Beaver Watershed Alliance: $275k → 17%Arkansas Fish & Game Fnd: $58k → 17%Friends of Lake Ouachita: $15k → 17%Iowa Dept of Natural Resourse: $263k → 10%Missouri Dept of Conversation: $117k → 17%Department of the Army: $30k → 21%Tennessee Wildlife Resources: $119k → 14%Georgia BASS Nation Youth Inc: $10k → 11%Reef Ball Foundation: $20k → 27%B&R Construction: $131k → 11%Berks County Conservation: $14k → 11%Pymatuning Lake Assn: $110k → 14%Missouri Dept of Conversation: $67k → 17%Missouri Dept of Conservation: $26k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
IA
PA
MO
AR
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Iowa Dept of Natural Resourse: $262,831 · OtherIowa Dept of Natural ResourseMissouri Dept of Conversation: $183,555 · OtherMissouri Dept of ConversationUpper Trinity Regional Water: $160,000 · OtherUpper Trinity Regional WaterIndividual grant recipient: $133,716 · OtherIndividual grant recipientB&R Construction: $131,453 · OtherB&R ConstructionIndividual grant recipient: $119,095 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTexas Parks & Wildlife: $89,984 · OtherTexas Parks & WildlifeNorthcentral Pennsylvania Con: $75,000 · OtherNorthcentral Pennsylvania ConArkansas Fish & Game Fnd: $57,500 · Other+4 more: $88,564 · Other+4 moreBEAVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE: $275,000 · EnvironmentBEAVER WATERSHED ALLIANCEPYMATUNING LAKE ASSOCIATION: $109,832 · EnvironmentPYMATUNING LAKE ASSOCIATIO…FRIENDS OF LAKE OUACHITA INC: $15,000 · EnvironmentREEF BALL FOUNDATION INC: $19,996 · Animals
Other$1,301,698Environment$399,832Animals$19,996

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBEAVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE: $275,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetPYMATUNING LAKE ASSOCIATION: $109,832 over 1y, 79% of budgetREEF BALL FOUNDATION INC: $19,996 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetFRIENDS OF LAKE OUACHITA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 63% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BEAVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PYMATUNING LAKE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds REEF BALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LAKE OUACHITA INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Fish Habitat Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Fish Habitat Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to National Fish Habitat Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to National Fish Habitat Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Fish Habitat’s filings →

    More from the funding graph