· Public charity
National Exchange Club Foundation
To raise and provide financial resources for the national exchange club and its programs of service, including our national project, the prevention of child abuse.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $335,674 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $464,501 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $128,827 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $23k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $105k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $207k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB | $157,403 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF NORMAN OK | $50,000 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB DANIEL ISLAND SC | $30,604 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF LIMA OH | $14,400 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF MIDLAND MI | $13,000 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF RUTHERFORD COUNTY TN | $12,500 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF EMERALD COAST FL | $11,711 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF MADISON CT | $11,575 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF DONELSON-HERMITAGE TN | $11,000 |
| EXCHANGE CLUB OF SAN CLEMENTE CA | $9,450 |
| NORTH CAROLINA DISTRICT | $7,281 |
| UNION COLONY EXCHANGE CLUB OF GREELEY CO | $6,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NENATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +10%
- NENATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB9× · 2017–2025 · $116k · revenue +158% · 84% of their budget
- ECExchange Club of Madison8× · 2017–2025 · $113k · revenue +2% · 64% of their budget
Funded once
- FCFIREFLY CHILDREN & FAMILY ALLIANCEone grant, 2024 · $61k
- NENATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUBone grant, 2019 · $46k
- NENATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUBone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bristol exchange club joins other clubs around the country to make our community a better place to live
To raise and provide financial resources for the Exchange Club of Rome and its Programs of Service, including our National Project, the prevention of child abuse.
College scholarships to local high school students support local charities child abuse prevention program support
Prevent child abuse
Purpose: to identify opportunities within their communities and offer assistance to fill gaps in services provide a selection of activities designed to benefit and encourage our nation's youth and to provide a variety of public awareness…
To assist with conducting and funding the Community Service, Youth Activities, Americanism, Child Abuse Prevention and any other charitable activities of the Exchange Club of Butte, Montana, a local chapter of The National Exchange Club.
To provide funding for child abuse prevention and youth scholarships.
The exchange club of highline is organized as a local representative of the national exchange club, a 501-c(4) tax exempt organization, to provide community services.
Prevention of child abuse through support of programs in the local community.
Service and funding of americanism,child abuse prevention programs, and youth programs in the community and schools
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Exchange Club Exchange Club of Daniel Island and the most unlike its peers is 1MATTERSORG. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB Exchange Club of Daniel Island ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB AKA HOBBY AIRPORT AREA EXCHANGE CLUB ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB ↗
- Who funds Exchange Club of Madison ↗
- Who funds THE EXCHANGE CLUB OF MOORESVILLELA ↗
- Who funds 1MATTERSORG ↗
- Who funds EXCHANGE CLUB OF SAN CLEMENTE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB 2109 DONELSON HERMITAGE AREA ↗
- Who funds THE EXCHANGE CLUB OF ALBANY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EXCHANGE CLUB Crystal Valley Exchange Club ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN CITY EXCHANGE CLUB ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Exchange Club Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.