Skip to content

· Public charity

National Energy Education Development Project Inc

The mission of the national energy education development project, inc.

$3.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$145k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Environment$2.8MEmployment$213kYouth Development$75kEducation$50kHousing & Shelter$34kPhilanthropy$30kHuman Services$24kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 44 grants below total $2,115,391, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,646,414 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,531,023 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $410k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.7M
$48,988
Median grant
4
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF LYNN$145,000
TOWN OF GROTON$120,000
FRANKLIN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS$120,000
CITY OF BROCKTON$120,000
CITY OF QUINCY$117,500
TOWN OF WESTHAMPTON$87,263
TOWN OF RANDOLPH$85,000
CITY OF WOBURN$80,000
PIONEER VALLEY PLANNING COMM$79,128
ROANOKE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$75,000
CITY OF FALL RIVER$74,400
CITY OF LEOMINSTER$62,400
CITY OF TAUNTON$60,000
CITY OF EVERETT$60,000
TOWN OF FAIRHAVEN$60,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $196k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $13k → 16%PIONEER VALLEY PLANNING COMM: $79k → 17%YMCA OF BUCKS & HUNTERDON COUNTIES: $7k → 6%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $10k → 7%QUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC: $10k → 7%ACLAMO: $7k → 7%ASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION: $13k → 16%GREEN JOBS ACADEMY: $13k → 8%PROJECT RIGHT INC: $13k → 16%CAMBODIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LOWELL INC: $33k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
CA
WV
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 11 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
45

Total granted

$344k
$944k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+21%

Still filing today

91%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREEN BEVERLY 107Q INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $48k · revenue +23%
  • CA
    CAPE AND ISLANDS SELF-RELIANCE CORPORATION INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +15%
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $25k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SS
    SA SOLAR HOLDCO 2022 LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $125k
  • SF
    SECURE FUTURES LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $89k
  • MC
    MERCER CO BD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2023 · $63k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental League of Massachusetts Inc

The organization's mission is to advocate for policy that meets the scale and urgency of our environmental challenges. as a massachusetts-based organization that engages in advocacy across a full spectrum of climate, environmental, and…

Environment
2
Alternatives for Community and Environment Inc

Ace builds the power of communities of color and low-income communities in massachusetts to eradicate environmental racism and classism, create healthy, sustainable communities, and achieve environmental justice.

Community Improvement
3
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
4
Montgomery County Green Bank Corporation

Montgomery county green bank corporation is making energy efficiency and clean energy attainable for all in our community and creating a more sustainable and resilient future.

Environment
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
8
Browning the Green Space Inc

We seek to facilitate a just energy transition by putting black and brown communities first, and enabling systems change at the intersection of social, environmental, and economic justice. we are powering a just energy transition in the…

Environment
9
Greater New Bedford Workforce Investment Board Inc

Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.

Community Improvement
10
Grid Alternatives Affiliates & Subsidiaries

To provide energy cost savings to low-income homeowners through installation of solar electric systems and training in energy efficiency, while providing hands-on solar installation opportunities to job training organizations and community…

Environment
11
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
12
Climate Jobs National Resource Center Inc

To educate workers and the public about policies that will build a clean energy economy at the scale climate science demands, create good union jobs, and create more equitable communities.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oakland Hebrew Day School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/46
Grantees still filing
29/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LYNN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $145,000 · OtherLYNN PUBLIC SCHOOLSSA SOLAR HOLDCO 2022 LLC: $125,000 · OtherFRANKLIN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS: $120,000 · OtherTown of Groton: $120,000 · OtherCITY OF BROCKTON - TREASURER'S OFFICE: $120,000 · OtherQUINCY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $117,500 · OtherSECURE FUTURES LLC: $88,673 · Other+52 more: $1,817,048 · Other+52 moreGREEN BEVERLY 107Q INC: $48,300 · EnvironmentCLEAN WATER FUND: $36,500 · EnvironmentCAPE AND ISLANDS SELF-RELIANCE CORPORATION INC: $25,110 · EnvironmentBETTER FUTURE PROJECT INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentNEW ECOLOGY INC: $25,000 · EnvironmentMassEnergize Inc: $25,000 · EnvironmentCLIMABLE INC: $19,000 · EnvironmentALL IN ENERGY INC: $12,500 · EnvironmentBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC: $12,500 · EnvironmentE INC: $12,500 · EnvironmentEnergy Allies A NJ Nonprofit Corporation: $12,500 · Environment+1 more: $5,500 · EnvironmentPIONEER VALLEY PROJECT INC: $79,128 · Human ServicesCambodian Mutual Assistance Association of Greater Lowell Inc: $32,500 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT RIGHT: $12,500 · Human ServicesSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesQUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC: $10,100 · Human ServicesYWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $10,000 · Human ServicesRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $7,000 · Human ServicesACLAMO: $7,000 · Human ServicesWORCESTER COMMON GROUND INC: $23,750 · Housing & ShelterGREEN ENERGY CONSUMERS ALLIANCE INC: $23,750 · Housing & ShelterMASSACHUSETTS AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCORA SERVICES INC: $17,000 · EducationGREATER BOSTON CHAPTER - AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF BLACKS IN ENERGY AABE Greater Boston: $12,500 · EducationOakland Hebrew Day School: $8,180 · EducationFoundation for Fresno Unified Students: $5,775 · EducationLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $12,500 · Community ImprovementJASTECH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,653,221Environment$259,410Human Services$195,728Housing & Shelter$57,500Education$43,455Community Improvement$32,500Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRESIST INC: $71,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN BEVERLY 107Q INC: $48,300 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetCLEAN WATER FUND: $36,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCambodian Mutual Assistance Association of Greater Lowell Inc: $32,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT: $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPE AND ISLANDS SELF-RELIANCE CORPORATION INC: $25,110 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW ECOLOGY INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMassEnergize Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetWORCESTER COMMON GROUND INC: $23,750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREEN ENERGY CONSUMERS ALLIANCE INC: $23,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMANSHIP ARTIST RESIDENCE AND STUDIOS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetCLIMABLE INC: $19,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBOYS' & GIRLS' CLUB OF CHESTER: $18,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetCORA SERVICES INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALL IN ENERGY INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetJOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND TRAINING TRUST FUND LOCAL 103 IBEW: $12,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY WORKSHOPS INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT RIGHT: $12,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEnergy Allies A NJ Nonprofit Corporation: $12,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLegacy Youth Tennis And Education Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetQUINCY ASIAN RESOURCES INC: $10,100 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASOCIACION MINISTERIAL EVANGELICA DEL AREA LAWRENC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AFFORDABLE HOUSING ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJASTECH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetYWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOakland Hebrew Day School: $8,180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF PUBLIC POLICY INC: $8,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetGIRLS INC OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY: $7,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRIVER CROSSING YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACLAMO: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCRADLE OF LIBERTY COUNCIL 525 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFoundation for Fresno Unified Students: $5,775 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds RESIST INC ↗
  • Who funds GREEN BEVERLY 107Q INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEAN WATER FUND ↗
  • Who funds Cambodian Mutual Assistance Association of Greater Lowell Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ENERGY WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds AFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS ↗
  • Who funds CAPE AND ISLANDS SELF-RELIANCE CORPORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN CIVIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Center for Technology and Civic LifeIL32.6× affinity20 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Center for Technology and Civic Life · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Bread-The Walk for Hunger Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Barr Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Philadelphia Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Energy Education Development Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Energy Education Development Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Project Right: 71% of income from government
  • Quincy Asian Resources Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Community Workshops Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Asian American Civic Association Inc: 19% of income from government
  • South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc: 18% of income from government
  • MassEnergize Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Manship Artist Residence and Studios Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
  • New Ecology Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Worcester Common Ground Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Green Beverly 107Q Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Energy Education Development Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph